-
Draft bans stablecoin yield and interest-like features, blocking direct and indirect reward structures across platforms.
-
Allowed rewards include activity-based incentives, but must not depend on balances or resemble interest mechanisms.
-
SEC, CFTC, and Treasury will define rules and anti-evasion measures, shaping future stablecoin reward frameworks.
New legislative language tied to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act surfaced on March 23, 2026, outlining fresh restrictions on stablecoin yields and rewards. According to journalist Eleanor Terrett, industry leaders reviewed the draft the same day. The proposal aims to limit interest-like features on stablecoins while defining acceptable reward structures.
Yield Restrictions and Core Provisions
According to Eleanor Terrett, the draft would prohibit platforms from offering yield on stablecoins, both directly and indirectly. This includes any structure that resembles a bank deposit or functions like interest. The restriction applies broadly to digital asset service providers, including exchanges and brokers.
Additionally, the language bars any mechanism considered “economically or functionally equivalent” to interest. This provision aims to prevent firms from bypassing the rule through alternative structures. As a result, platforms may face tighter controls on how they design financial products tied to stablecoins.
Permitted Rewards and Regulatory Oversight
However, the proposal allows certain activity-based rewards linked to user behavior. These include loyalty programs, promotions, and subscription-based incentives. Still, such rewards must not resemble interest or depend on balances or transaction amounts.
Furthermore, the draft directs the Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the U.S. Treasury to define permissible rewards. These agencies must also establish anti-evasion rules within one year. This step introduces a coordinated regulatory framework for stablecoin-related incentives.
Industry Reaction and Legislative Context
Industry responses to the draft remain mixed. One leader described the proposal as a departure from earlier discussions with the White House. They noted that the “economic equivalence” standard may allow stricter interpretations by future regulators.
Another reviewer called the approach more restrictive overall, citing limits on reward structures. However, a separate industry participant said the draft aligns with expectations. They added that it preserves transaction-based incentives while preventing stablecoins from acting like interest-bearing accounts.
Meanwhile, the proposal expands beyond the earlier framework introduced by Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks. Bank representatives are now set to review the draft, with further discussions expected ahead of the next legislative steps.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Pakistan Lifts an Eight-Year Ban: Central Bank Allows Banks to Serve Crypto Businesses, and the Virtual Assets Law Takes Effect
On April 14, 2026, the State Bank of Pakistan lifted its crypto-assets banking ban that has been in place since 2018, officially kicking off the Virtual Assets Act 2026. Banks may open accounts for licensed virtual asset service providers, but must establish a segregation-of-funds mechanism to ensure that customers’ funds are not affected. This policy change responds to domestic demand and demonstrates Pakistan’s growing role on the international stage.
ChainNewsAbmedia5h ago
The central bank issues a digital currency report—does it directly refute Qu Bo? If Taiwan issues a CBDC, merchants generally cannot refuse to accept it
The central bank released a report stating that Taiwan’s CBDC development will follow a phased promotion strategy. In the short term, it is not urgent to issue retail CBDC; the focus is on wholesale CBDC and the infrastructure for asset tokenization. The central bank emphasized that CBDC will not increase the money supply and will have legal standing. As a rule, merchants may not refuse to accept it, in order to prevent the payment market from becoming overly dependent on the private sector.
ChainNewsAbmedia6h ago
White House Report Challenges Stablecoin Yield Ban, CLARITY Act Advances in Senate
A White House report argues against banning stablecoin yields, highlighting minimal benefits for bank lending and reduced consumer earnings. Key officials support the CLARITY Act, but the Senate Banking Committee's timeline remains uncertain, affecting the bill's chances before summer recess.
GateNews8h ago
Criticized for freezing too slowly: USDC freezes are taking too long! Circle CEO: We will definitely wait for a court order before freezing; we refuse to freeze it on our own
Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire said the company will not proactively freeze wallet addresses unless it receives a court order or law-enforcement requirement. Even amid allegations of hacker money laundering and community backlash, Circle continues to insist on operating under the rule of law.
Jeremy Allaire sets Circle’s law-enforcement bottom line
-----------------------------
As the global cryptocurrency market surges with uncertainty, Circle’s CEO Jeremy Allaire, at a press conference in Seoul, South Korea, made a clear stance on the market’s most sensitive issue of “asset freezes.” He noted that while Circle has technical means to freeze specific wallet addresses, unless it receives a court order or an official directive from law-enforcement agencies, the company will not
CryptoCity8h ago
Can bypass FSC regulations on using credit cards to buy crypto? OdinTing introduces the Wallet Pro service for buying crypto with a U.S. debit card
The OwlPay and Wallet Pro services launched by OdinTin use stablecoin technology to enable B2B cross-border payments, and—by partnering with major international payment players—showcase its ambitions for expansion in the fintech sector. By operating from overseas, OdinTin bypasses Taiwan’s regulatory restrictions, providing fast virtual-asset trading. Meanwhile, as it faces the newly promulgated Virtual Asset Services Act, it is set to become a reference template for other foreign-invested companies entering the Taiwan market.
CryptoCity9h ago
CLARITY Act Dropped From Senate Schedule; Crypto Bill Faces May Deadline to Avoid 2030 Delay
Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott has delayed advancing the CLARITY Act due to unresolved issues, including stablecoin disputes and DeFi provisions. With a critical May deadline approaching, the bill's future remains uncertain amid political challenges.
GateNews10h ago
