Forward the Original Title ‘Flash Boys of Crypto’

How would you feel if your WhatsApp messages took 10 seconds to get the blue tick, and you had to wait for 10 seconds for your friend’s reply to reach you? Frustrating right? Welcome to blockchain’s biggest unsolved pain point: communication latency.

Blockchains aren’t about money at all—they’re about communication. What we perceive as “value transfer” is actually an information exchange problem. While some blockchains like Bitcoin actually move coins, others like ETH operate differently. When you send 5 ETH to your friend, you’re not moving digital coins; you’re broadcasting a message that updates a distributed ledger. The true innovation of blockchain wasn’t just the concept of “digital currency”, but a new approach to synchronizing information across untrusted networks.

Packets of value are stored within IP packets of information that stream through the global internet rails. The same method applies outside blockchain networks.

When Taylor Swift drops the latest concert tickets, thousands of fans hammer Ticketmaster’s servers, each sending a packet screaming, “Give me a ticket!” The system queues them by arrival time, and whoever’s packet lands first wins. Determining the order of arrival is crucial for fair allocation.

Tech companies like Amazon and Facebook understand that relying on public internet lines to provide the type of experiences and performance that users want across the world is impossible. The time taken for a video request that originates in London to hit their servers in the USA and to stream the video data back across the physical distance adds latency to the experience.

That’s why they set up data centers globally where server data is periodically replicated across these centers and users are connected to the closest data center for low latency. Meta operates 24 data centers around the globe, investing over $30 billion to ensure Instagram’s endless scroll remains seamless and responsive, maintaining ultra-low latency for billions of users.

Blockchains are going through this transition shifting focus towards providing a reliable and user friendly experience. While they have established themselves as value transfer systems, users know that interacting with these platforms is quite painful. When Trump launched his own memecoin in January, over 200k users simultaneously rushed to participate, overwhelming the Solana network, resulting in numerous failed transactions and leaving many early participants disappointed.

Why Solana Drops Packets While Ethereum Waits

Ethereum and Solana illustrate different approaches to solving blockchain’s “communication problem.” Blockchains rely on validators—a network of dedicated hardware nodes responsible for collecting transactions, executing them to verify correctness, and organizing them into blocks. Depending on the consensus mechanism, validators get the right to build a block and when a transaction is part of a block that’s committed on-chain, it’s considered settled.

Ethereum’s “Wait in Line” Approach: Ethereum’s slower block time (12-15 seconds) allows ample time for message propagation across its network. Transactions enter a mempool—a waiting room—where validators select, order, and process transactions methodically, ensuring reliability over speed. This approach prioritizes transaction certainty at the cost of user experience and gas fees.

Solana’s “Risk Losing Packets” Philosophy: Solana pushes the limits with 400ms block times, aggressively prioritizing speed. However, this extreme speed means packets frequently get lost if network latency exceeds Solana’s tight timing window, resulting in transaction failures and network instability during peak traffic. Solana doesn’t have a mempool, so users will need to retry until it reaches a validator.

Validators face a complex dual role—simultaneously acting as communication hubs (receiving and broadcasting transactions) and computational nodes (executing and validating transactions). Ethereum validators allocate their resources primarily toward computation, with ample time for communication. In contrast, Solana validators juggle intense computational tasks with heavy networking demands, requiring high-end hardware.

Two-Step Validation: Reimagining the Pipeline

As blockchain networks evolve, two distinct paths are emerging to solve the communication bottleneck.

Path 1: Software-Driven Pre-Confirmations (MegaETH)

MegaETH, a Layer 2 solution, aims to deliver a ‘real-time’ web3 experience by delivering rapid “pre-confirmations” — assurances that the transaction will be included in the next block. MegaETH achieves this by dividing responsibilities across specialized nodes:

Sequencer: High-powered hardware handling performance-level transaction execution

Full Nodes: A decentralized network of nodes responsible for double checking blocks produced by the sequencer

Provers: Nodes focused on generating transaction proofs that can be validated by light weight clients

All transactions are routed to the high-performance sequencer that bundles transactions into blocks every second. However, users often demand even quicker confirmations as in the case of on-chain gaming or DEX trading. Because MegaETH uses only one sequencer instead of a network of nodes, it can issue ‘pre-confirmations’ at 1ms intervals.

The sequencer builds ‘mini-blocks’ - packages of processed transactions every 10 ms and provides these inclusion confirmations. Applications can treat these as validated transactions, displaying results on the front end without waiting for complete block production and chain addition.

Source - https://x.com/ShivanshuMadan/status/1902388855862640664

The MegaETH sequencer operates on powerful hardware: 100 cores, 1-4TB RAM, and 10Gbps network bandwidth. Blockchain data resides in CPU memory rather than slower disk storage, and verification processes are distributed across multiple cores, targeting throughput exceeding 100,000 transactions per second.

This architecture’s reliance on a centralized sequencer does introduce trust tradeoffs. If the sequencer experiences downtime, transaction confirmations may face delays until backup systems activate. MegaETH mitigates this risk by employing a network of full nodes that re-execute every transaction, verifying the sequencer’s accuracy. Sequencers must stake collateral subject to slashing penalties for misconduct.

MegaETH launched its public testnet last month and encountered downtime issues. While it looked like a sequencer failure, the actual culprit was an RPC bug preventing transactions from reaching the sequencer.

RPC (Remote Procedure Call) is a middleware that enables apps to interact with blockchain nodes and send/receive transactions without running a node of their own. In response, the MegaETH team is developing a high-performance RPC stack capable of matching their throughput requirements.

Path 2: Infrastructure-driven Priority lane ( Solana’s DoubleZero Protocol)

@doublezero is building “Flashboys for Solana.” In his bestseller Flashboys, Michael Lewis wrote about how high-frequency trading(HFT) firms spent $300 Mn to lay an optical fiber line between Chicago and New York to gain a 4 ms trading advantage—illustrating how critical ultra-low latency is in high-stakes environments.

Led by Austin Federa, formerly of the Solana Foundation, this project emerged from collaborative work with the Firedancer team, developers of Solana’s high-performance validator client. Federa recognized that while Firedancer could theoretically process millions of transactions per second, scaling such performance across thousands of nodes on the public internet presented significant challenges.

Inspired by how HFT firms leveraged private fiber lines to minimize latency, DoubleZero is building a DEPIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network) comprising underutilized fiber links. Networking companies contribute idle broadband capacity and earn rewards, with transactions routed through this dedicated infrastructure to validators worldwide.

The protocol has a two-ring architecture :

• Outer ring (Ingress/Egress): Dedicated hardware at network edges filters inbound traffic, mitigates DDoS(Distributed Denial of Service) attacks, verifies signatures, and eliminates duplicate transactions before they enter the core network.
• Inner ring (Data Flow): Filtered transactions are routed over dedicated bandwidth to the global set of Solana validators.

Effectively, DoubleZero introduces a mempool to the Solana network from which validators can source transactions. The initial hardware filtration layer reduces spam, allowing Solana validators to focus processing capacity on legitimate, value-generating transactions.

Historically, low-fee blockchains like Solana have been vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks due to the minimal cost of network spam. Such attacks, often bot-driven, have been launched by competitors to disrupt platforms and even cause full network outages across multiple chains.

To address this, DoubleZero leverages Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs)—specialized chips that excel at parallel processing compared to traditional CPUs, which handle sequential general-purpose tasks. These FGPAs are reprogrammed to efficiently handle specific tasks like signature verification before transactions are routed deeper into the network.

This optimization reduces computational load for validators, which typically spend up to 70% of processing time verifying signatures rather than building new blocks. The team plans to support multiple networks beyond Solana, including Aptos, Celestia, Sui, and Avalanche, with mainnet launch targeted for late 2025.

DoubleZero is experimenting with a reward mechanism that compensates infrastructure contributors based on performance improvements relative to public internet standards, encouraging high-quality infrastructure contributions that strengthen overall network resilience.

While there’s a valid concern that this layer might become a centralized chokepoint, applications can connect directly to Solana validators through public internet routes. Staking in DoubleZero primarily serves as security collateral against malicious actions rather than influencing decisions around traffic routing.

To New Possibilities in User Experience

For blockchain to achieve mainstream adoption, the experience has to be as seamless. Transactions need to feel as immediate and reliable as sending a text message or swiping a credit card.

Sub-second transaction finality doesn’t just improve current blockchain applications — it unlocks entirely new categories previously impossible. If we were to request pitches from startups in this space, here is what we are thinking of —

Real Time financial infrastructure: High frequency market making for on-chain and traditional assets, broker systems that can handle 24/7 forex trades for institutions.

Real-Time Collaborative DApps: Multiplayer applications such as games and socialFi with minimal latency.

Developer Infrastructure: Services optimizing transaction queuing, mempool management and priority across multiple chains.

Advanced Communication Infrastructure: Blockchain-native CDNs optimizing data and transaction delivery.

Transparent Web2 Auctions: Lots of web2 applications such as Google Ads use a centralized server, these can be directed on-chain for fairness and honesty.

Disclaimer:

1. This article is reprinted from [Decentralised.Co]. Forward the Original Title ‘Flash Boys of Crypto’. All copyrights belong to the original author [Decentralised.Co]. If there are objections to this reprint, please contact the Gate Learn team, and they will handle it promptly.
2. Liability Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute any investment advice.
3. The Gate Learn team does translations of the article into other languages. Copying, distributing, or plagiarizing the translated articles is prohibited unless mentioned.