CoinShares Says Quantum Computing Poses No Immediate Threat to Bitcoin Security

CryptoNewsLand
BTC-2,53%
  • CoinShares says quantum computing poses a long term risk to Bitcoin but current technology cannot threaten the network.

  • Only a small share of Bitcoin sits in legacy addresses and most holdings remain too spread out for attacks today.

  • Bitcoin can upgrade its cryptography over time and users can already move funds to safer address formats now easily.

Bitcoin faces a distant quantum computing risk rather than an immediate security crisis, according to a recent research note from CoinShares. The firm said public debate often exaggerates the current danger to Bitcoin’s cryptography.

🔥QUANTUM THREAT TO BITCOIN IS OVERSTATED

CoinShares says only 10,200 BTC are realistically at risk, and breaking Bitcoin would require quantum machines 100,000x more powerful than today, likely a decade away. pic.twitter.com/xKXD3ECQpK

— Nehal (@nehalzzzz1) February 9, 2026

Instead, the report described the issue as a long-term technical challenge. Moreover, CoinShares stressed that existing technology cannot break Bitcoin security today. As a result, the firm urged markets to focus on realistic timelines.

Quantum Risk Timeline Remains Distant

CoinShares said credible quantum threats remain at least a decade away. Bitcoin relies on cryptographic systems to protect private keys and confirm transactions. In theory, advanced quantum machines could derive private keys from public information. However, required computing power remains far beyond current hardware. Furthermore, quantum systems face major engineering limits. Therefore, the report found no near-term threat to the network.

Limited Exposure Across Bitcoin Supply

The report narrowed potential exposure to older Bitcoin address types. Roughly 8% of the total supply sits in legacy Pay-to-Public-Key addresses. These addresses reveal public keys directly on the blockchain. Even so, CoinShares found that most of this bitcoin remains widely distributed.

Only a small portion sits in addresses large enough to disrupt markets. Meanwhile, thousands of smaller outputs hold the remaining coins. Consequently, exploiting them would require unrealistic quantum capacity.

Network Defenses and Market Response

Bitcoin’s core hashing function remains secure under realistic assumptions. Quantum computers could speed up brute-force attempts but not enough to break mining security. In addition, Bitcoin has upgraded its cryptography before. The network can adopt quantum-resistant signatures through future updates. Users with older addresses can already reduce risk by moving funds. Therefore, practical defenses already exist.

CoinShares also challenged higher vulnerability estimates cited by some market participants. The report said those estimates grouped different risk categories together. This approach overstated actual exposure. CoinShares opposed drastic actions like burning vulnerable coins. Such steps could weaken property rights and decentralization. Instead, the firm supported gradual preparation and proven solutions.

Market conditions remain volatile as Bitcoin trades below recent highs. However, CoinShares said price weakness does not reflect quantum urgency. Investment flows have declined alongside broader risk aversion. The price of Bitcoin has intensified as BTC currently trades around $65,000–$69,000. Even so, development around post-quantum tools continues. CoinShares concluded that Bitcoin faces a manageable engineering task with ample preparation time

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Willy Woo: Energy is the only path to forging hard currency, and Bitcoin is built on that.

Gate News message, April 7, a well-known Bitcoin analyst Willy Woo recently responded to a post questioning that “Bitcoin consumes too much energy.” He said there are only three ways to ensure the safety of a currency’s ledger: relying on physical atoms (like gold), depending on energy consumption (like Bitcoin), and building on social/political consensus (like fiat currency). Willy Woo emphasized that energy is the only path to forging an absolute hard currency, and physical atoms are not scarce.

GateNews21m ago

BTC 15-minute rise of 0.45%: driven by routine trading, with moderately resonating macro hedging sentiment

From 2026-04-07 15:15 to 15:30 (UTC), Bitcoin (BTC) recorded a +0.45% return. The price moved slightly upward within the USDT range of 67,886.0 to 68,199.5, with an amplitude of 0.46%. During this period, market attention increased somewhat, but overall volatility remained within the normal range, and no unusual market fluctuations appeared. The main driving force behind this anomaly was routine trading activity in the spot market. On-chain data shows that the number of active addresses in the 15-minute window was about 66,000, slightly higher than the previous period. In the same period, spot trading volume increased by about 0.5 from the previous period over period

GateNews32m ago

Charles Schwab Wealth Management Warning: Allocating 1%-3% of an investment portfolio to BTC/ETH can significantly alter the risk profile.

Gate News message: On April 7, the U.S. financial giant Charles Schwab released a research bulletin warning that even if only 1%-3% of funds are allocated to Bitcoin or Ethereum within an investment portfolio, it may significantly change the portfolio’s overall risk characteristics. The research report notes that Bitcoin and Ethereum have both historically experienced drawdowns of more than 70%, far higher than the volatility levels of stocks or bonds; therefore, even small allocations can have a noticeable impact during periods of market volatility. Charles Schwab proposed two cryptocurrency allocation approaches: one is the traditional portfolio theory method, which allocates based on expected returns, volatility, and correlation; the other is a risk-based method, which determines the share of crypto assets according to the level of risk one is willing to take, shifting the focus from returns to risk tolerance.

GateNews48m ago
Comment
0/400
No comments