Most special purpose acquisition vehicles aren't worth the attention if you're buying at face value—you typically need to wait for that brutal 90% drawdown before they become interesting. Valuation matters. That said, some sponsors break the mold. When a team has already delivered track records through previous SPAC launches, and you're looking at fundamentals that don't scream "overheated," it shifts the calculus. A company trading at 100x forward sales is objectively stretched, sure. But execution by credible operators sometimes changes the game. The thesis here isn't about chasing hype—it's about backing teams that have proven they can navigate these structures and actually build value. 📈
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletWhisperer
· 8h ago
Entering at a 90% drop? Alright, just wait for that slaughter moment. But to be honest, having a reliable team can indeed change the game, I have to admit that.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezer
· 10h ago
Ha, that's right. Most SPACs are trash and only have a chance after being cut in half... But truly capable teams are indeed different. I will still follow sponsors who have a track record of continuous success, as the gamble is on the people, not the concept.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 12-27 00:47
Oh dear, it's the same old tired rhetoric... I'm tired of hearing the argument to wait for a 90% drop before entering the market. The key is whether the team has real skills; don't just tell stories.
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghost
· 12-27 00:47
Wait, so that means most SPACs are garbage unless they drop 90%? That logic is pretty extreme haha
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy_Group
· 12-27 00:36
A reliable team can indeed change the game, but that 100x valuation is still a bit outrageous haha
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluff
· 12-27 00:34
Wait a minute, there's some logic here... It sounds like you have to wait for a 90% drop to get in, but then you say a capable team can change the game... So should I wait or not?
View OriginalReply0
BetterLuckyThanSmart
· 12-27 00:33
Alright, a reliable team can indeed turn the situation around, but to be honest, most SPACs are still just a way to harvest retail investors... Waiting for that 90% drop is the real time to buy the dip.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 12-27 00:22
Data shows that reliable SPAC sponsors are indeed different; smart people have already been tracking their wallet addresses.
Most special purpose acquisition vehicles aren't worth the attention if you're buying at face value—you typically need to wait for that brutal 90% drawdown before they become interesting. Valuation matters. That said, some sponsors break the mold. When a team has already delivered track records through previous SPAC launches, and you're looking at fundamentals that don't scream "overheated," it shifts the calculus. A company trading at 100x forward sales is objectively stretched, sure. But execution by credible operators sometimes changes the game. The thesis here isn't about chasing hype—it's about backing teams that have proven they can navigate these structures and actually build value. 📈