January 27 News, Bitcoin early contributor and Blockstream CEO Adam Back reiterated that if the United States establishes a Bitcoin strategic reserve, the price of Bitcoin could potentially reach $1 million per coin in the long term. As the macro global landscape and monetary system uncertainties increase by 2026, sovereign institutions’ interest in Bitcoin is being reassessed by the market.
Adam Back believes that Bitcoin’s core advantage lies in its strictly limited supply mechanism. The total supply of Bitcoin is encoded in the protocol, with a permanent cap of 21 million coins, and no institution can dilute its value through issuance. Once national-level buyers enter the market, this structure will create a significant supply and demand mismatch. Back estimates that if several major economies each wish to hold about 1 million Bitcoin as reserve assets, the existing circulating supply will be quickly absorbed.
Unlike fiat currency systems, governments cannot “print” Bitcoin, which means all purchases must be completed on the open market. In the context of long-term holders, miners, and institutions already controlling large amounts, new buying pressure will face extremely limited available supply, creating an environment highly conducive to rapid price increases.
Some signs have already begun to emerge. Previously, the Czech National Bank disclosed a Bitcoin purchase of about $1 million, which, although not large, was seen as an important signal of the central bank testing the waters with digital assets. The market generally believes that such operations often start with small-scale testing and may gradually increase allocation over time.
Adam Back also mentioned that geopolitical competition could become another driving force. If a major country takes the lead in including Bitcoin in its strategic reserves, other countries, to avoid falling behind in the financial system, are likely to follow suit. This “reserve race” will further amplify structural demand for Bitcoin.
While the $1 million target remains controversial, the long-term pricing logic of Bitcoin is changing amid the intertwined expectations of fixed supply, institutional adoption, and national-level acceptance. As discussions about Bitcoin strategic reserves continue to heat up, the global positioning of this asset is being rewritten.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
BTC 15-minute drop of 0.58%: Large on-chain withdrawals and bearish derivatives sentiment coincide to weigh on the price
From 2026-04-12 22:00 to 22:15 (UTC), the BTC price fluctuated between 70693.8 and 71371.8 USDT. During this period, the candlestick return rate recorded -0.58%, and the amplitude reached 0.95%. The short-term downside caused market attention to rise rapidly, and some investors accelerated adjustments to their hedging positions.
The main drivers behind this change were concentrated on-chain large-fund outflows and a short-term defensive shift in the derivatives market. On-chain data shows that net outflow transactions of large funds $100k and above totaled more than 800 BTC in aggregate from exchanges; meanwhile, the exchanges’ overall BTC holdings
GateNews45m ago
The New York Times reignites the “Satoshi identity mystery”; after Adam Back was targeted, he quickly clarified
Author: Nancy, PANews
Satoshi Nakamoto’s real identity remains the mystery that has continued for 17 years in the crypto world. Guesses surrounding this pseudonym have never stopped—candidates ranging from cryptographers to company founders have come and gone, yet there has always been a lack of decisive evidence.
Recently, The New York Times published a 10,000-plus-word investigation. Based on multiple comparisons drawn from language style, technical paths, and historical context, it ranked Blockstream CEO Adam Back as the strongest candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto. However, this claim was quickly and explicitly denied by Back himself, and the relevant arguments were widely questioned by the industry as difficult to substantiate.
Satoshi Nakamoto identity controversy flares up again; the 10,000-plus-word investigation targets Adam Back
In this investigation, New York Times reporter John Carreyrou spent more than a year deeply sorting through decades of archives and the cypherpunk email mailing lists to
区块客3h ago
