RootData: Next week, 28 types of Token will undergo a one-time unlock, with OP, SOL, W, CHELL, and ENA unlocking a value of over 20 million dollars.

ChainCatcher
OP4,14%
SOL2,53%
ENA1,78%

According to ChainCatcher news and official information from RootData, from March 31 to April 6, 28 types of tokens will undergo a one-time unlock. Among them, OP, SOL, W, CHELL, and ENA will unlock a value of over 20 million dollars.

OP will unlock over 32,212,200 Tokens on March 31, with a value of approximately 27.77 million USD, accounting for 0.75% of the circulating supply. SOL will unlock over 2.7248 million Tokens on April 1, with a value of 363 million USD, accounting for 0.54% of the circulating supply; W will unlock over 1.367 billion Tokens on April 3, with a value of 130 million dollars, accounting for 13.68% of the circulating supply; CHELL will unlock over 2.6715 million Tokens on April 3, with a value of 21.53 million USD, accounting for 0.27% of the circulation. ENA will unlock over 134 million Tokens on April 5, with a value of 54.49 million USD, accounting for 0.9% of the circulating supply.

It is worth noting that SOL ranks first with an unlocked value of 363 million USD, and has increased by 4.23% over the past 7 days.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
GateUser-b76d427bvip
· 2025-03-30 15:46
thank you for the interesting article
View OriginalReply0