On February 12, it was reported that in 2026, the American Bankers Association (ABA) officially sent a letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), demanding an immediate halt to the review of national bank charters for multiple cryptocurrency companies, including Ripple, Circle, and other related applicants. This move is seen as a strong countermeasure by the traditional American banking system against the expansion of the digital asset sector.
In the letter, the ABA stated that until Congress completes a regulatory framework for crypto finance, the OCC should not continue processing these applications at the traditional banking approval pace. The association emphasized that regulators must thoroughly assess applicants’ compliance responsibilities, capital structures, and potential systemic risks before issuing any charters.
One of the contentious issues is the GENIUS Act. The ABA criticized the OCC for tying charter approvals to this bill, which still requires several federal agencies to complete supporting regulations, and full implementation could take years. The ABA is concerned that issuing licenses prematurely, before the regulatory system is fully developed, could increase bankruptcy and liquidity risks.
Currently, Ripple’s application is the most closely watched. The company previously received conditional approval from the OCC, which was seen as a step away from full licensing. This development has triggered strong opposition from the ABA. Additionally, World Liberty Financial has also applied to become a federally chartered national trust bank, sparking controversy in political circles.
Besides these companies, Circle, BitGo, Paxos, and Laser Digital, a subsidiary of Nomura Securities, have also been mentioned as relevant cases. The ABA also warned that some crypto institutions might bypass restrictions on interest income outlined in the GENIUS Act through affiliated platforms, creating regulatory arbitrage.
This incident indicates that the battle between the US crypto finance sector and the traditional banking system is escalating. As legislative and regulatory processes continue to advance, whether the OCC will adjust its review pace will directly impact the institutionalization of the US digital asset industry.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
How OTC merchants step by step into the trap of "illegal business operation"
Author: Lawyer Shao Shiwei
Profiting from buying and selling virtual currencies through price differences, but being prosecuted for receiving foreign exchange transfer funds—this article is based on a real case handled by Lawyer Shao, involving an OTC merchant accused of illegal business operations and concealing criminal proceeds through off-market USDT transactions.
In this case, the involved party has long been engaged in buying and selling USDT to earn price differences. During a normal transaction, he unfortunately received RMB funds transferred by an underground bank upstream, illegally exchanging currency for others. Big data analysis confirmed that this fund was identified as foreign exchange transfer funds.
The question then arises: Is simply earning from virtual currency price differences enough to be criminally liable for receiving foreign exchange transfer funds from illegal foreign exchange transactions upstream?
More notably, there are differing opinions within the case-handling agency regarding whether to apply the crime of illegal business operations or the crime of concealing and disguising criminal proceeds.
Lawyer Shao’s view is that such cases cannot be simply classified; the behavior must be assessed based on the individual's role in a layered manner.
PANews8m ago
XRP Could Face Securities Classification Under New U.S. Crypto Framework, Says Cardano’s Hoskinson
Charles Hoskinson argues that under the revised CLARITY Act, tokens like XRP would qualify as securities, igniting his feud with the XRP community.
He called Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse out again, cautioning that having no laws is better than having a bad law.
Cardano founder Charles Hoskin
CryptoNewsFlash22m ago
Bank failures, war conflicts: Iran's $7.8 billion cryptocurrency "shadow economy" becomes the focus again
As the US-Israel coalition escalates actions against Iran, the country's "shadow economy" has once again come into focus. Iran is using cheap electricity to mine Bitcoin, stabilizing its currency and bypassing sanctions. Mining hash rate accounts for 2%-5% of the global total and is expected to create a $7.8 billion ecosystem by 2025. The stablecoin USDT is also used to stabilize the rial exchange rate, which has depreciated by over 96%. Additionally, during protests, the public has accelerated their shift to Bitcoin to protect assets.
区块客43m ago
TRM Labs Reports $35B Lost to Crypto Scams Worldwide in 2025
TRM Labs reports a rise in global crypto fraud, reaching $35 billion in 2025, likely underestimating actual losses. Enhanced training and blockchain tools are essential for law enforcement to combat sophisticated fraud schemes effectively.
TheNewsCrypto44m ago
Iran and North Korea are both using it! Stablecoins have become the preferred virtual asset for illegal transactions, with involved fraud totaling $51 billion.
According to the FATF report, stablecoins have become the preferred asset for illegal transactions, especially in countries like Iran and North Korea. The organization calls for increased regulation of stablecoin issuers and states that by 2025, stablecoins will account for the majority of illegal virtual asset transactions. To address these challenges, the FATF recommends that issuers strengthen their technical capabilities to improve regulatory efficiency.
区块客47m ago
FATF: Peer-to-peer transfers of stablecoins pose a major money laundering risk; it is recommended that issuers introduce freezing and blacklisting mechanisms.
The latest FATF report indicates that P2P transfers of stablecoins have become a major source of money laundering risk in the crypto space, especially in unhosted wallet transactions where regulation is difficult. Approximately 84% of illegal crypto transactions involve stablecoins. FATF recommends strengthening regulation of stablecoin issuers and promoting anti-money laundering measures.
GateNews2h ago
