Most special purpose acquisition vehicles aren't worth the attention if you're buying at face value—you typically need to wait for that brutal 90% drawdown before they become interesting. Valuation matters. That said, some sponsors break the mold. When a team has already delivered track records through previous SPAC launches, and you're looking at fundamentals that don't scream "overheated," it shifts the calculus. A company trading at 100x forward sales is objectively stretched, sure. But execution by credible operators sometimes changes the game. The thesis here isn't about chasing hype—it's about backing teams that have proven they can navigate these structures and actually build value. 📈
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
UnluckyValidator
· 17h ago
Oh dear, it's the same old tired rhetoric... I'm tired of hearing the argument to wait for a 90% drop before entering the market. The key is whether the team has real skills; don't just tell stories.
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghost
· 17h ago
Wait, so that means most SPACs are garbage unless they drop 90%? That logic is pretty extreme haha
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy_Group
· 17h ago
A reliable team can indeed change the game, but that 100x valuation is still a bit outrageous haha
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluff
· 17h ago
Wait a minute, there's some logic here... It sounds like you have to wait for a 90% drop to get in, but then you say a capable team can change the game... So should I wait or not?
View OriginalReply0
BetterLuckyThanSmart
· 17h ago
Alright, a reliable team can indeed turn the situation around, but to be honest, most SPACs are still just a way to harvest retail investors... Waiting for that 90% drop is the real time to buy the dip.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 17h ago
Data shows that reliable SPAC sponsors are indeed different; smart people have already been tracking their wallet addresses.
Most special purpose acquisition vehicles aren't worth the attention if you're buying at face value—you typically need to wait for that brutal 90% drawdown before they become interesting. Valuation matters. That said, some sponsors break the mold. When a team has already delivered track records through previous SPAC launches, and you're looking at fundamentals that don't scream "overheated," it shifts the calculus. A company trading at 100x forward sales is objectively stretched, sure. But execution by credible operators sometimes changes the game. The thesis here isn't about chasing hype—it's about backing teams that have proven they can navigate these structures and actually build value. 📈