Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Kneel or retaliate: Trump demands the dismissal of Netflix's Susan Rice
U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly demanded that Netflix remove board member Susan Rice. This demand arose after Rice made comments about how Democrats respond to companies opposing them. Trump warned on social media platform X (formerly Twitter) that Netflix must fire Rice or face serious consequences.
Rice’s Comments and Background
Susan Rice had issued statements about how the Democratic Party deals with companies that oppose them. Specifically, she said they might consider retaliating against companies that “kneel” to the president’s policies. This highlights the complex relationship between U.S. politics and corporate governance, showing how political pressure can influence private sector decision-making.
Trump’s Response and Political Intent
According to reports from Bloomberg and others, Trump’s public demand reflects concerns about corporations’ ability to use media and power structures to send political messages. Trump indicated he intends to use political influence to pressure companies that oppose his policies without “kneeling.” This is an unusual example of a politician directly interfering in corporate personnel decisions, which is rare in American political culture.
Conflict Between Corporate Governance and Political Neutrality
This incident reveals a new conflict between corporations and political leaders. It raises fundamental questions about whether companies should remain independent from political pressure or adapt to political realities. Whether Rice remains on Netflix’s board is more than a personnel issue; it reflects broader concerns about how American private companies respond to political pressure.
Going forward, how other major companies respond to such political pressures and how they balance governance with political independence will be closely watched as key issues.