I just came across a coin called "Violent Horse." At first glance, I thought it was just a pure hype coin, but after checking out the rules, I found it quite interesting. The logic is straightforward: every transaction involves a burn, so the more active the liquidity, the slower the chips decrease; another part of the transaction fee is directly distributed to long-term holders, effectively embedding the "hold" mentality into the mechanism rather than relying on slogans. To be honest, compared to fourmeme launch, I think the Butterfly approach is more like the legitimate gameplay that should exist on BSC, and the founder of this Butterfly platform is also involved. Of course, I should mention that whether it can ultimately succeed depends on whether there are real transactions and sustained liquidity support in the future. I personally see it more as a mechanism-oriented project to observe, not just mindless shuffling. If you're interested, you can check it out on-chain: 0x487cd6bdfa6c461aa45b8fefe603f74be4d27777
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
I just came across a coin called "Violent Horse." At first glance, I thought it was just a pure hype coin, but after checking out the rules, I found it quite interesting. The logic is straightforward: every transaction involves a burn, so the more active the liquidity, the slower the chips decrease; another part of the transaction fee is directly distributed to long-term holders, effectively embedding the "hold" mentality into the mechanism rather than relying on slogans. To be honest, compared to fourmeme launch, I think the Butterfly approach is more like the legitimate gameplay that should exist on BSC, and the founder of this Butterfly platform is also involved. Of course, I should mention that whether it can ultimately succeed depends on whether there are real transactions and sustained liquidity support in the future. I personally see it more as a mechanism-oriented project to observe, not just mindless shuffling. If you're interested, you can check it out on-chain: 0x487cd6bdfa6c461aa45b8fefe603f74be4d27777