Doing a poor job is doing a poor job, and there's nothing to justify. Admitting mistakes and accepting criticism are basic attitudes, and I don't want to vent emotions or stir up trouble through sarcastic remarks.
This kind of situation is most common in project recommendations—because of a single tweet, some people make money while others lose money. But the reality is very harsh: those who make money definitely won't come out now to thank you, and those who lose money will definitely be the most aggressive. I am all too clear about this logic.
As for my personality, you can say I am willful. Since I want to try, I’ll give it a shot, anyway, it’s already like this. Deleting the group was also out of willfulness—simple and straightforward, I don’t want to see these voices anymore. Sometimes, avoiding is faster than confronting.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainTalker
· 4h ago
actually, the asymmetry here is wild — winners ghost you, losers rage. game theory 101 tbh. but here's the thing: owning it vs. deleting the group chat? fundamentally different energy. one's accountability, other's just noise cancellation with extra steps.
Reply0
ApeDegen
· 7h ago
People who make money won't speak out, while those who lose loudly complain—that's the crypto world... Honestly, it's just that straightforward.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 7h ago
People who make money won't thank you, and those who lose will fight the hardest. This logic indeed makes sense. But is deleting the group the end of it?
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 7h ago
Damn, this logic makes no sense. Those making money play dead, while the losers won't leave you alone.
Honestly, sometimes deleting things feels better, don't bother yourself anymore.
Just admit the mistake, no need to explain further, anyway explanations are useless.
This is the current state of Web3, no matter what you push, someone will criticize, unlucky.
So what if you're a little stubborn? The result is the same anyway, might as well be straightforward.
Avoidance is indeed more comfortable than confrontation, just accept it first and then move on.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_fish
· 7h ago
Those who make money stay silent, while those who lose go crazy—that's the truth of the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 7h ago
Those who profit stay silent, those who lose howl—this is the reality of the crypto world.
If you're wrong, you're wrong. No need to make excuses; deleting groups is the most satisfying.
Being willful? That's true character, no need to pretend.
Sometimes, avoiding the issue is indeed much more comfortable than arguing further.
Admitting shortcomings is truly rare; most people are just passing the buck.
View OriginalReply0
Rekt_Recovery
· 7h ago
ngl this hits different when you've been liquidated before... the winners never thank you, only the burnt bags show up swinging 💀
Doing a poor job is doing a poor job, and there's nothing to justify. Admitting mistakes and accepting criticism are basic attitudes, and I don't want to vent emotions or stir up trouble through sarcastic remarks.
This kind of situation is most common in project recommendations—because of a single tweet, some people make money while others lose money. But the reality is very harsh: those who make money definitely won't come out now to thank you, and those who lose money will definitely be the most aggressive. I am all too clear about this logic.
As for my personality, you can say I am willful. Since I want to try, I’ll give it a shot, anyway, it’s already like this. Deleting the group was also out of willfulness—simple and straightforward, I don’t want to see these voices anymore. Sometimes, avoiding is faster than confronting.