Specialized AI models? That's a trap. Here's the reality: the game is consolidating fast. Within three years, a few dominant models will dominate the landscape, crushing niche competitors in their path. The playbook everyone's copying from Vertical SaaS won't work here. AI doesn't follow those rules. Betting on fragmentation isn't just wrong—it's ignoring what's actually happening in the market.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenRationEatervip
· 15h ago
Is there a problem with this logic? Can the monopoly of large models really hold up for three years?
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_watchervip
· 01-17 19:42
Uh... there's a flaw in this logic. The vertical model can still survive; it just depends on how you cut it.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullTherapistvip
· 01-16 20:37
To be honest, the era of large models is a winner-takes-all game, and I saw it coming a long time ago. Those guys still betting on vertical small models, get ready to be crushed.
View OriginalReply0
FastLeavervip
· 01-16 20:35
Honestly, the vertical SaaS approach is indeed outdated, and the AI track is dominated by the giants.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_vibingvip
· 01-16 20:22
NGL, this view is a bit absolute... To be so confident about who will win or lose three years from now is really too optimistic, isn't it?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)