2026-01-15 12:22:36

After conducting research, I found that this solution requires a private server WebSocket connection, which is simply not feasible in a single-page application. The key issue is—many exchange request limits seem simple but are actually very tricky. For example, claiming 1000x permissions sounds impressive, but in practice, when fetching data, each 20 requests only consume 50 quota. To refresh the full data set of over 3500 at once would directly overwhelm the server. Therefore, the most practical approach is: stay close to the limit but don't exceed it, precisely calculate quota consumption, and find that balance point between real-time performance and cost.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StillBuyingTheDip

· 01-18 08:06

Damn, the exchange's weighting system is really outrageous. It looks high-end but is actually a trap. --- Another seemingly simple but actually very complex requirement. WebSocket has to be built by ourselves. --- 1000x permissions sound great, but it turns out to be虚的, and still relies on finely tuned algorithms. --- That's why I keep saying self-built services are necessary. SPA stuff can't handle this level of requests at all. --- Weight consumption really needs careful calculation. Nobody wants to experience that feeling of the server crashing due to a small mistake. --- Balancing real-time performance and cost? Easier said than done, requires constant parameter tuning. --- So how to stay comfortable under restrictions? That's the real technical challenge. --- 3500+ data points crashing on a single refresh? Luckily, I踩过这个坑提前, or there would have been a serious issue online.

View OriginalReply0

HorizonHunter

· 01-15 12:52

Really, the exchange's weighting system is just a trap, each number more intimidating than the last --- Private servers are indeed unavoidable, SPA can't handle it at all --- 1000x permissions? Laughable, only when you use it do you realize what being "cut" like a chive really means --- This is the reality, ideals and practical operations are always worlds apart --- Calculating the weight consumption just makes you numb, and you have to jump back and forth between speed and cost --- Anyone who's done this understands, setting limits is completely a riddle --- So, there's no API from an exchange that isn't a trap; you have to navigate the pitfalls yourself --- The key is to find that threshold; being too precise can easily cause a crash --- WebSocket is a must, there's no other way out --- Only 50 weight per 20 requests? How ridiculous is this ratio?

View OriginalReply0

LuckyBlindCat

· 01-15 12:52

The exchange's weight system is really impressive; just looking at the numbers is intimidating, but in reality, it's a complete trap. --- We've long stepped on the pitfalls of WebSocket private connections; SPA is directly out of the game. --- 1000x permissions? That's laughable. When you get it, it's still the same small amount. --- Accurate quota limiting is truly a technical skill; almost causing an explosion. --- No one explained the weight consumption clearly in advance; you have to test them one by one. --- Real-time performance and cost are inherently at odds; choosing one means sacrificing the other. --- Over 3500 data entries refresh and everything crashes—who designed this experience? --- You still need to use a private server; SPA really can't handle it. --- Only 50 weights for every 20 requests? How long would it take to refresh then?

View OriginalReply0

BearHugger

· 01-15 12:51

The exchange's weighting calculation is really just a numbers game. It looks generous but is actually very stingy.

View OriginalReply0

PoetryOnChain

· 01-15 12:46

The exchange's weight system is really amazing. On the surface, a 1000x permission sounds great, but in practice, it's just a joke haha --- There's no choice but to use private servers; SPA is directly out of the picture --- I've also fallen into the trap of weight calculation. Later, I gave up on pursuing real-time performance; stability is more important than anything --- So, you see, even seemingly simple APIs are actually trapping you. You have to explore that critical point yourself --- Over 3500+ data points crashing the server in one go? This design itself is problematic, right? --- In the end, it still depends on experience to balance things. No matter how clear the documentation is, it’s useless

View OriginalReply0

FreeMinter

· 01-15 12:43

That exchange's weighting system is really a trap. Just looking at the numbers seems impressive, but in practice, it's eye-opening.

View OriginalReply0

Ser_Liquidated

· 01-15 12:38

Exchange weights are really a trap, 1000x permissions sound impressive but are disappointing in practice. Private servers are the right way, SPA is completely useless. If you ask me, it’s all about refined operations. Don’t be greedy with a one-size-fits-all approach, or it’s a suicidal move.

View OriginalReply0