2026-01-15 05:40:39

Google's recently launched AI General Commercial Protocol UCP has attracted attention. The current issue is clear: although AI Agents perform well, they are still stuck at the stage of entering real economic activities.

Where is the fundamental dilemma? The existing online commercial ecosystem is built around human visual interfaces. Users need to click, swipe, and input—this interaction logic is optimized for humans. For AI Agents to participate, they must first translate these human operations, which is very inefficient and costly.

The value of the UCP protocol lies precisely here. If a set of AI-native commercial communication standards can be established, allowing Agents to communicate directly with systems and skip the visual layer conversion process, then Web3 payments and application innovations will have new possibilities.

Imagine: Agents no longer need to simulate human operations; they can directly initiate transactions, execute contracts, and call services. This means the level of automation will increase by an order of magnitude, and application scenarios will explode. For the Web3 ecosystem, this could be a critical shift from "human-driven" to "Agent-driven."

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ZKProofster

· 1h ago

ngl, "AI-native protocol" sounds nice until you realize we're just abstracting away the UI layer without actually solving for trustlessness. where's the cryptographic guarantee that agents won't just... do whatever? 🤔

Reply0

ProtocolRebel

· 6h ago

Honestly, I've always thought it's ridiculous that AI is stuck at the UI layer. Now Google has finally figured it out. Both protocols and standards—can we stop just hyping them up and actually get them to work? Agent-driven sounds great, but could it just be another empty dream in Web3? It feels to me like this is just RPC calls with a different name. What's new about that? If direct trading really becomes possible, DeFi vampire frontrunners might be out of a job again, haha. No matter how many protocols there are, the ecosystem needs to catch up. Right now, it's still just a gimmick. Can UCP really solve the gas fee problem? That’s what people care about the most.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotDayLaborer

· 6h ago

Basically, it's about opening a "black technology channel" for AI, so there's no need to struggle with those broken interfaces designed for humans. --- If UCP can really be implemented, Web3 will truly come to life. Right now, it's still too slow. --- Wow, an Agent-based direct dialogue system? How fast could transaction speeds get? Has anyone calculated it? --- Switching from human-driven to Agent-driven sounds great, but who will manage these Agents? Won't they get out of control? --- Google is really playing a big game. Skipping the visual layer is indeed a brilliant idea. --- The problem is, how many applications currently support this UCP? Or is it just another promising protocol standard to look at? --- It's like opening a VIP channel for robots, finally no more queuing and squeezing with humans, haha. --- If automation efficiency can really be boosted by an order of magnitude, the crypto world will go nuts.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 6h ago

In simple terms, it's about wanting AI to do the work directly without having to learn the complicated procedures humans use. This idea indeed makes sense. However, with such aggressive hype, how many of these implementations will actually succeed? It always feels like a concept that’s bigger than its practical application. UCP protocol sounds like a direction, but in the ecosystem, everyone wants to develop their own standards. It’s unlikely they can truly unify them. Wait, does this mean that in the future we will have to compete with Agents for transactions? Kinda scary haha. It’s about time for this. UI interaction is indeed a bottleneck, and the idea of agent-driven economy will come sooner or later. The issue is security. How to prevent attacks when directly calling contracts? Have they thought this through? It still depends on whether a major ecosystem will truly adopt this protocol; otherwise, it’s just an empty dream. Increasing automation of agents isn’t necessarily a bad thing. After all, our Web3 goal has always been trustless. It sounds like the next overhyped narrative, but this time, there might really be something to it.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureVerifier

· 6h ago

ngl, "AI-native protocol" sounds great on paper but has anyone actually audited the underlying validation mechanisms here? technically speaking, jumping the human visual layer directly to agent-to-system dialogue... requires further auditing before we declare victory. potential attack vector seems statistically improbable to ignore. trust but verify, always.

Reply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 6h ago

Another big hype, Agent direct connection trading sounds great, but can it really be implemented? I'm still a bit skeptical.

View OriginalReply0

blockBoy

· 6h ago

Basically, it's about wanting AI to do the work directly, instead of clicking around like humans.

View OriginalReply0