The approach to on-chain identity has been fundamentally flawed for too long.
When projects needed to meet compliance requirements, they did the obvious thing: capture everything, store everything, hope nothing gets breached. It's the playbook everyone defaulted to.
But this model was never going to scale. Security risks pile up, user trust erodes, and the whole thing becomes a liability.
There's a better way emerging. Projects are starting to rethink how identity infrastructure should actually work—focusing on privacy-first design rather than data accumulation. The shift matters because it changes the entire equation for what on-chain identity can become.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The approach to on-chain identity has been fundamentally flawed for too long.
When projects needed to meet compliance requirements, they did the obvious thing: capture everything, store everything, hope nothing gets breached. It's the playbook everyone defaulted to.
But this model was never going to scale. Security risks pile up, user trust erodes, and the whole thing becomes a liability.
There's a better way emerging. Projects are starting to rethink how identity infrastructure should actually work—focusing on privacy-first design rather than data accumulation. The shift matters because it changes the entire equation for what on-chain identity can become.