2026-01-13 13:39:55

Interesting move from Microsoft—they're basically telling utility companies and public commissions that electricity rates for their datacenters need to go up. Why? Because current pricing doesn't actually cover their operational costs.

This touches on something crypto folks should pay attention to: the economics of running massive computing infrastructure. Whether it's cloud servers or blockchain validation nodes, the energy bill is brutal. If Big Tech is openly asking regulators to hike rates just to break even, it says something about how expensive it really is to operate at scale.

The infrastructure game isn't cheap. Data centers consume insane amounts of power, and squeezing pennies on electricity matters when you're running millions of servers. Microsoft's play here is straightforward—better rates that reflect true costs than trying to survive on rates designed decades ago when computing needs were totally different.

It's a reminder that Web3 infrastructure, whether centralized or decentralized, faces the same brutal math: energy costs are non-negotiable.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ApeWithNoFear

· 3h ago

Microsoft has directly confronted the issue: electricity costs are not enough. Have you ever thought that the cost of mining is actually as terrifying as this... Energy consumption is the real key, everything else is just虚的

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerForever

· 3h ago

Haha, Microsoft is indirectly shifting the blame. They can't even cover electricity costs and are calling for price hikes, which shows how outrageous data center expenses are. Not gonna lie, this is a wake-up call for miners and validation nodes; energy costs are unavoidable. Speaking of which, running infrastructure these days is just a money-burning game. No wonder so many people are rushing into Web3, yet it's still half-dead. Reminds me of those so-called revolutionary chains from before, which all ended up dying because of energy bills... Big companies are bargaining with the government. How are small projects supposed to survive? Truly impressive.

View OriginalReply0

Layer3Dreamer

· 3h ago

theoretically speaking, if we map microsoft's power cost crisis onto the recursive nature of blockchain state verification... the math gets *really* uncomfortable. they're basically admitting the trilemma is unfixable by throwing money at it lmao

Reply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 3h ago

Microsoft's move this time is really impressive, directly complaining to the electricity department about being broke... It shows that big companies can't handle energy costs. Had I known that those Web3 folks were still bragging about how decentralized systems save money, but in reality, energy bills are unavoidable, and everyone has to pay the same.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaMillionairen't

· 3h ago

Microsoft's move is brilliant, directly telling regulators: "Bro, electricity costs need to go up, or we can't play." This is actually a reminder for the old-timers in the crypto circle... The energy consumption costs of infrastructure are not as cheap as you imagine, whether centralized or decentralized, both can't escape the pull of the energy black hole. Really, big companies are on the brink of bankruptcy, and we're still discussing the costs of layer2... Energy costs will never compromise; everyone has to pay up willingly.

View OriginalReply0