Solana has maintained stable withdrawals for over a month, while BSC's momentum has decayed within three days—what does this durability difference indicate?

The core lies in the fundamental differences in liquidity mechanisms. When ecosystem liquidity heavily relies on support from official or a few leading entities, the project’s slowdown causes the entire ecosystem to stall. BSC has long faced this dilemma—publicly emphasizing openness and unity, but in reality, decision-making power is overly centralized, and ecosystem development is often limited to controllable projects. This highly centralized governance structure naturally excludes the possibility of wild growth.

In contrast, although Solana also faces centralization debates, its ecosystem participants’ autonomy, innovation enthusiasm, and diversified liquidity support enable the ecosystem to sustain vitality longer. This is not just a technical issue but also a reflection of ecosystem design philosophy—those who grant the ecosystem enough freedom can go further.