2026-01-13 06:30:11

Why do the operational logics of traditional stock funds and digital asset markets differ so greatly? Recently, AI-themed funds have shown outstanding performance, attracting a large influx of capital under the dual effects of favorable catalysts and recommendations from leading investors. In contrast, the order placement behavior in the cryptocurrency market faces stricter regulatory scrutiny. This reflects the significant differences in regulatory standards and risk management requirements between different asset classes. Traditional financial markets have relatively mature regulatory systems, while the compliance framework for the digital asset ecosystem is still being developed. How to balance the investor protection mechanisms and information disclosure requirements in the two markets is an interesting question.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

JustAnotherWallet

· 01-14 22:27

Basically, traditional finance has someone backing them, while the crypto world has to figure things out on their own.

View OriginalReply0

DegenGambler

· 01-14 11:22

Traditional finance can openly cut leeks, while the crypto world is being tightly suppressed. This is unfair. AI funds are booming, but crypto gets penalized. Double standards to the extreme. Regulation, honestly, is about whoever has more power gets to decide. Compliance frameworks? Haha, stablecoins are almost gone. It's really just traditional finance afraid that we make quick money, and they're terrified. Talking about investor protection, the tricks used by TradFi are even more ruthless than on-chain gray industry, right?

View OriginalReply0

unrekt.eth

· 01-14 05:56

Basically, the traditional financial rules have been in place for decades, while crypto is still in the wild growth stage... But this actually gives us more opportunities.

View OriginalReply0

fren_with_benefits

· 01-13 07:00

Honestly, the AI fund this time is just hype; the real profiters are still those who entered early. 完善 compliance frameworks is a good thing, but we also need to leave some room for crypto. Overregulation might stifle innovation. The traditional financial rules are fundamentally incompatible with Web3.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAnxiety

· 01-13 06:59

In essence, the traditional financial methods have long been understood, while our crypto circle is still being used as a testing ground. --- AI funds are aggressively siphoning funds, but signals are being manipulated—that's the reality. --- Regulatory standards differ; to put it bluntly, some are pampered while others are oppressed. --- Is the compliance framework still being improved? It feels like it's always in progress. When will it truly be implemented? --- The game rules on both sides are fundamentally unequal. Why can traditional finance openly and legitimately harvest profits? --- Investor protection mechanisms? That's laughable. Just see whose money is more valuable. --- Essentially, it's a matter of power and discourse, not a technical issue.

View OriginalReply0

OnlyUpOnly

· 01-13 06:58

Basically, the tricks used in traditional finance have long been tamed by regulators, while here we are still growing wildly under various restrictions...

View OriginalReply0

RumbleValidator

· 01-13 06:57

In plain terms, it's an issue of verification efficiency. Traditional finance has a centralized information disclosure mechanism, so data credibility naturally has an advantage. What about the crypto market? Poor node stability and consensus mechanisms still in the process of tuning, which leads to regulators having to be more stringent. It's not discrimination; the system reliability is truly not in the same league.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichDetector

· 01-13 06:57

Basically, it's still double standards. AI funds can openly exploit, while our crypto circle has to sneak around.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoDouble-O-Seven

· 01-13 06:48

Basically, traditional finance is good at what it does, while we're still under regulation... Traditional finance dares to operate openly, but when it comes to crypto, even a single trade gets scrutinized—double standards... Why can AI funds aggressively raise funds while crypto trading signals are considered violations? The rules of the game are different. The regulatory framework can't keep up with the pace of development—that's the core issue... Wait, so does that mean there's still a chance for crypto to make a comeback? As long as the compliance framework is sorted out? Once the disclosure requirements are aligned, crypto can truly take off.

View OriginalReply0

RooftopReserver

· 01-13 06:43

Regulatory discrepancies are so outrageous. Traditional finance can lead transactions without anyone monitoring, but the crypto world gets scrutinized the moment it moves. It's a clear case of double standards.

View OriginalReply0