Claude Code is indeed exploring its own approach. Based on the release frequency, the entire growth flywheel has basically been set in motion.
However, frankly speaking, for scenarios involving important knowledge accumulation and data memory, caution is still necessary. The platform policy change risk is present, and if sudden adjustments occur, the losses could be hard to bear.
The more stable approach at the moment is to focus on auxiliary research and small-scale experiments. Tasks like code development and data exploration, which are relatively low risk, are more suitable. Once the ecosystem and policy environment become more stable, consider more core application scenarios. This way, you can enjoy the benefits of tool innovation while keeping risks within an acceptable range.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SleepyValidator
· 14h ago
Starting the flywheel is a good thing, but policies can change suddenly. Let's stick to low-risk activities to practice first.
View OriginalReply0
DaoTherapy
· 14h ago
We still need to wait for the policies to stabilize before we can put all our eggs in one basket.
View OriginalReply0
MainnetDelayedAgain
· 14h ago
According to the database, it's the same old script of "waiting for policies to stabilize," how many days have passed since the last time this was said? It is recommended to be included in the Guinness World Records.
View OriginalReply0
PumpAnalyst
· 14h ago
Cautiously bearish, but Claude Code this time really has some substance, it's gaining momentum [thinking]
Wait, everyone pay attention, the policy risk is right here. The previous trap was set by the whales, don't foolishly put all your core assets in
It's safer to play swing trading, small-scale experiments are the safest. Wait until the ecosystem bottoms out
I'm not pessimistic, but we must have risk control awareness, brothers
The technical aspect looks good, but we need to see more support levels. Platforms like this are most afraid of policy-triggered limit downs
Auxiliary research is fine, but don't jump into the core applications yet, to avoid being cut off
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 14h ago
Based on recent release cycle data, the monthly update frequency of Claude Code has indeed broken all previous records, but... the real issue lies in policy risk. According to past platform adjustment precedents, the probability of sudden policy changes is about 35%, and once triggered, the impact on core business can be difficult to estimate.
From three perspectives: first is data persistence risk, second is ecosystem lock-in degree, and third is backup migration cost. Currently, it is recommended to adopt a phased strategy—initially focusing on low-risk tasks, and only considering deep integration after TVL and user base reach a certain scale. In simple terms, it’s about first capitalizing on the benefits, and keeping risks controllable is the key.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightning
· 14h ago
Starting the flywheel is good, but throwing your vital data into it? Bro, you need to stay calm.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 14h ago
The flywheel is starting up, which is a good thing, but we do need to be cautious about policy risks. Take it step by step, and don't bet everything on something that's not yet stable.
Claude Code is indeed exploring its own approach. Based on the release frequency, the entire growth flywheel has basically been set in motion.
However, frankly speaking, for scenarios involving important knowledge accumulation and data memory, caution is still necessary. The platform policy change risk is present, and if sudden adjustments occur, the losses could be hard to bear.
The more stable approach at the moment is to focus on auxiliary research and small-scale experiments. Tasks like code development and data exploration, which are relatively low risk, are more suitable. Once the ecosystem and policy environment become more stable, consider more core application scenarios. This way, you can enjoy the benefits of tool innovation while keeping risks within an acceptable range.