A certain political force in the United States recently did something interesting—launched a crypto fundraising platform that allows campaign teams to receive donations directly in Bitcoin and USDC. The logic behind this is quite clear: they are targeting crypto community voters, aiming to regain support from this group in the upcoming election cycle, while also testing the potential of small donors.
Interestingly, the platform's positioning is very cautious—not claiming to be "pro-crypto policy," but emphasizing "compliance infrastructure." In other words, they want to convey that this is not about making political promises but about building a technical solution that complies with regulatory frameworks. Involving relevant regulations from the FEC (Federal Election Commission), the entire system is very compliant. This stance actually reflects a current reality—crypto assets are moving from the fringe to the mainstream financial ecosystem, even traditional political forces are beginning to take this market seriously.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoHistoryClass
· 1h ago
ah here we go again... "compliance infrastructure" lmao. statistically speaking, this is exactly how the dot-com bubble started convincing politicians it wasn't a bubble. they're not making promises, they're just... accepting your money in a new format. totally different vibes.
Reply0
SolidityNewbie
· 21h ago
Well... to put it simply, politicians are starting to get involved in crypto too. It's really interesting, finally seeing this day come.
View OriginalReply0
RatioHunter
· 21h ago
Alright, politicians are starting to get involved too. Now crypto is really going mainstream.
They don't talk about "pro-crypto," only "compliance." This kind of rhetoric is quite effective, very stable.
Wait, can we really accept Bitcoin? Then I have to ask, if the coin price crashes, will the votes drop too?
With political donations now open, does that mean crypto has officially entered the system? Think about it carefully, it's terrifying.
Isn't this just a disguised promise? What's the point of pretending? If you want crypto votes, you need to speak plainly.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatorFlash
· 21h ago
The rhetoric of compliance infrastructure... sounds like avoiding commitments. No matter how strict the risk control mechanisms are, they can't change the fundamental nature.
View OriginalReply0
gaslight_gasfeez
· 21h ago
Are you kidding me again here? Compliance infrastructure? Basically, just trying to scalp some profits.
---
Ha, now even politicians have to bow their heads and flatter us, a reversal, a reversal.
---
Wait, is this real? They’re directly asking for BTC and U? So FEC really just turns a blind eye?
---
Awesome, this is called mainstreaming... I think this is called surrender.
---
Compliance? Don’t make me laugh, it’s just that when there are more people, they have to pretend to be humble.
---
Let’s wait and see, they’ll come back to settle the score later, same old tricks.
---
I just want to know where these coins ended up in the end.
---
Finally someone admits it’s us, though their attitude is really awkward.
---
It’s the same old talk again, do you really think the crypto policy will be this subtle?
---
Testing small donations? Just want to see how much they can squeeze out.
A certain political force in the United States recently did something interesting—launched a crypto fundraising platform that allows campaign teams to receive donations directly in Bitcoin and USDC. The logic behind this is quite clear: they are targeting crypto community voters, aiming to regain support from this group in the upcoming election cycle, while also testing the potential of small donors.
Interestingly, the platform's positioning is very cautious—not claiming to be "pro-crypto policy," but emphasizing "compliance infrastructure." In other words, they want to convey that this is not about making political promises but about building a technical solution that complies with regulatory frameworks. Involving relevant regulations from the FEC (Federal Election Commission), the entire system is very compliant. This stance actually reflects a current reality—crypto assets are moving from the fringe to the mainstream financial ecosystem, even traditional political forces are beginning to take this market seriously.