Regulation is becoming the new baseline across financial ecosystems. Most digital transformation happens within traditional economy frameworks, but plenty of blockchain projects still operate like unpolished experiments forced into institutional constraints. That misalignment creates friction.



What stands out is when infrastructure gets purpose-built from the ground up—designed specifically to bridge decentralized systems with institutional requirements. That's where you see the real difference. Clean architecture, purposeful design, and ecosystems that actually feel enterprise-ready rather than cobbled together.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SerumSquirrelvip
· 11h ago
NGL, most chain projects are just to raise funds first and then talk. Now that regulations are tightening, they're panicking.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSellervip
· 11h ago
In simple terms, most blockchain projects are still growing wildly, and only a handful are truly compatible with the system.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 11h ago
Basically, those projects that never planned their architecture properly from the start are now being shackled by regulations. --- enterprise-ready? Listen to this term... True decentralization has long been gone. --- I've seen too many on-chain projects that feel cobbled together; few are actually well-designed. --- Regulation—either you consider it from the beginning, or you have to force changes later with no middle ground. --- Speaking of which, those who boast about being highly decentralized every day end up kneeling to traditional finance—pretty ironic. --- Building infrastructure from scratch is a different game; it saves you from patching things up every day later. --- These experimental projects should have died long ago; they only realize the problem when they face regulatory sanctions. --- The key question is, how many projects have truly achieved this "purpose-built"? I can't see any. --- So now, the race is about who can sneak into the system first; it's becoming more and more like traditional finance.
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobiavip
· 12h ago
Basically, it's time for those overly clever projects to wake up; regulation has become the standard.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420vip
· 12h ago
To be honest, most blockchain game projects are like this—look quite fancy in terms of architecture, but in reality, they collapse under compliance pressure. The few that do well truly understand that you need to prepare for institutions from the very beginning, not just forcibly fit into regulatory frameworks after the fact.
View OriginalReply0
ContractHuntervip
· 12h ago
In plain terms, most on-chain projects are still growing wildly and don't align at all with the regulatory framework.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)