2026-01-12 08:20:09

A major trading platform has indicated it might reassess backing the CLARITY Act should the bill expand beyond transparency mandates to restrict stablecoin yield mechanisms.

This conditional stance raises an interesting question: would stricter regulatory frameworks reshape how stablecoins compete in the market? The answer likely hinges on whether new rules level the playing field or entrench existing advantages.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 16h ago

Here we go again? Exchanges are now starting to haggle. Once it involves the revenue mechanism, they will back out. To put it simply, they are still protecting their own利益蛋糕.

View OriginalReply0

tx_pending_forever

· 01-12 08:47

Are there new rules for cutting leeks again? These exchanges just know how to turn hostile --- Stablecoin yields are being restricted, how do leading platforms still have a say --- Wait, it's both regulation and yield restrictions? Who benefits from this --- Basically, they're afraid of breaking the existing pattern --- As soon as the new rules come out, they change their tune. Business is so hard to run --- If stablecoin yields disappear, no one will use it. This logic makes sense

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBlackHole

· 01-12 08:42

Using the same old tricks? Cutting yield just reduces competitiveness. Big players remain big, while retail investors are still being harvested.

View OriginalReply0

GasGrillMaster