2026-01-11 10:21:46

Here's a reality check on what actually moves the needle: stop obsessing over launch frequency.

Everyone loves citing annual launch numbers—it sounds impressive on paper. But let's be real: what genuinely counts is payload delivery. Total useful cargo reaching orbit per year. That's the metric that separates substance from noise.

Launch counts are vanity stats. They don't tell you if anything meaningful got done. It's the same logic we see everywhere—people chase visibility instead of impact. The real question isn't "how many times did we try?" It's "what did we actually accomplish?"

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotGonnaMakeIt

· 20h ago

What's the use of launching so many times? The real skill is how much stuff you can actually send up there.

View OriginalReply0

OfflineValidator

· 22h ago

By the way, this kind of rhetoric is the same in crypto... constantly hyping up daily active users and new additions, but there are very few projects actually doing work on the chain; most are just air coins hyping themselves up.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLord

· 01-11 10:51

Paper numbers are just fooling nobody; only the assets that actually hit the target speak the truth. --- This logic applies just as well in the crypto world—air projects love to boast about funding rounds. --- It's another era of chasing hype rather than results, so funny. --- Payload is king; everything else is just packaging paper. --- That's right, but in the circle, they love to create momentum—who cares about real delivery? --- Speechless, hearing "launch, launch" every day, but what about the results? --- That's why I only pay attention to what is finally delivered. --- Totally agree, vanity metrics do more harm than good.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapy

· 01-11 10:49

Basically, it's a numbers game. Those who boast about the number of transactions are just trying to attract some attention. Actual effective payload is the real key; everything else is just castles in the air. This logic applies to the chain as well. No matter how much TPS is exaggerated, it’s useless. True user retention and ecosystem development are what really matter. Watching data reports every day is not as good as looking at real output. Many projects follow this routine. I dislike these vanity metrics. It's just as funny as some L2s bragging about how "fast" they are.

View OriginalReply0

degenonymous

· 01-11 10:48

The data on paper really should be stopped; it can really fool people. --- Only real gold and silver投入 in the track count for anything; what’s the use of just having a high launch number? --- It's the same old trick again—looking good on paper is enough, but what about the results? --- That's right, the crypto world is the same—so many projects, but how many actually deliver something? --- Payload delivery > Vanity rankings; this logic applies everywhere. --- Every day bragging about launch numbers, but in the end, nothing gets delivered—that's just the daily life of Web3. --- Face-slapping those who only hype data; the core is two words: delivery. --- Who isn't playing this game now? The more exaggerated the numbers, the easier it is to cut the leeks. --- That's the real deal—talking about data without actually building anything is pointless.

View OriginalReply0

ForumLurker

· 01-11 10:44

Having impressive numbers is useless; the key is how much actually materializes in the end. --- Once again, it's the same set of superficial metrics, just like the routine of hyping daily active users in the crypto world. --- Surface data always deceives; what truly matters is tangible output. --- Isn't this the phenomenon in Web3 where there are countless concepts but few real applications? Same story. --- Launching 100 times isn't as good as a reliable delivery once; many projects still haven't understood this principle. --- Oh well, that's why the projects that hype the most often end up failing. --- There's nothing wrong with that; compared to flashy launch events, I care more about the actual value that arrives.

View OriginalReply0

consensus_whisperer

· 01-11 10:39

Ah yes, finally someone has burst this bubble. What's the point of just blowing and launching repeatedly? What really matters is how much useful stuff actually gets sent up, right?

View OriginalReply0