A friend recently came to consult me, saying he lost all 4000U in crypto futures trading and asking if there's still a chance to turn things around. I asked him to first review the process of his losses—going all-in, chasing highs and cutting losses, trading against the trend, basically stepping on all the taboo rules of futures trading.



After talking, I realized that his core issue isn't about market direction judgment, but rather that he has no systematic approach to opening positions. So I shared with him a relatively structured framework:

**Three Stages of Opening a Position:**

Step 1: Initially allocate 20% of your capital. This is the trial-and-error phase, using the smallest cost to test the market's temperament.

Step 2: If the market moves against you and losses reach 10%, cut your position immediately. This keeps single-losses within 2% of your total funds, avoiding serious damage.

Step 3: If the direction is correct, after a 10% profit, add 20%. Continue this rhythm—another 10% increase, then another 20%, and on the third time, increase to 40%. This way, you can amplify gains in the right direction and reduce your average cost through batch additions. As long as the position doesn't retrace to -10%, hold on; if it drops below that, close all positions.

The underlying logic of this framework is to prioritize risk management. It’s somewhat similar to the philosophy of the trading legend Livermore—controlling risk with discipline and proportionality, letting profitable trades run as much as possible, and cutting losses quickly.

Of course, this is just a basic framework. In actual trading, many variables come into play, and market movements are always uncertain. I follow this approach myself; it’s relatively stable, but I wouldn’t claim it’s 100% effective. The core value of this method is to keep risk within controllable limits and improve long-term win rates.

The easiest way to get trapped in futures trading is lacking a methodology—ultimately turning into market fodder. Having a framework or not makes a huge difference in the outcome.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHarvestervip
· 22h ago
To be honest, losing 4000U is something I'm very familiar with. It's happening every day in the circle. The all-in approach can really ruin people. This framework sounds good, but what I really want to ask is—how many people can truly stick to stop-loss? Most are still controlled by FOMO, watching helplessly as -10% turns into -50% and they can't bring themselves to sell.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 01-10 09:45
The statement is correct, but I'm more concerned about how my friends with 4000U are doing now. Have they turned things around?
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoatvip
· 01-10 09:42
Going all-in to chase gains and buy the dip against the trend, this guy has messed up the crypto derivatives game. Honestly, without a plan, you're just courting death. Alright, this framework sounds good, but I still believe that knowing and doing are completely two different things. That's why most people are still just newbies; they simply can't execute. Stop-loss is really too difficult; the mental hurdle is hard to overcome. To put it nicely, in actual operation, who the hell can tolerate a 20% stop-loss? The Livermore approach is indeed brilliant, but the market variables are just too many now.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurDAOWatchervip
· 01-10 09:40
Well said, buddy. This is the right way to live in the crypto world; otherwise, you'll just become a leek farm.
View OriginalReply0
Layer3Dreamervip
· 01-10 09:39
theoretically speaking, the recursive nature of this risk framework actually mirrors cross-rollup state verification... except most people can't execute it under pressure lol
Reply0
HalfBuddhaMoneyvip
· 01-10 09:33
To be honest, this framework is indeed better than blindly going all-in, but what I really want to ask is—can anyone really stick to executing it?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)