2026-01-10 06:25:19

Trading Strategy Review | Day 13 Summary

Starting with an initial capital of 1000U, my account has now surpassed 4000U. What is the most important point in this process? Absolutely avoid high leverage. Many people ask me why my growth is stable, and the simple answer is this—higher leverage means greater risk, and a single margin call can wipe out all previous efforts.

More importantly, the assets under management have reached 68WU. As the scale grows, the strategy must also be upgraded. Large funds and small funds require completely different approaches. My current focus is on ensuring stability rather than blindly pursuing returns.

The upcoming plan is very clear: the Q1 goal is to achieve a monthly return of 50%, and by March, to increase the management scale to 200WU. This may sound aggressive, but based on the current growth curve, it is entirely feasible.

The core strategy remains the same—steady arbitrage. No chasing highs or panic selling, no betting on market direction, just focused execution. Continuous optimization, keep going.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StablecoinArbitrageur

· 01-10 16:05

actually the leverage discipline part hits different—most traders blow up their entire stack within 72 hours because they can't resist that siren call of 50x. but 1k to 4k while managing 6.8M AUM? that's genuinely compelling from a risk-adjusted returns perspective. the correlation between account longevity and refusing degeneracy is basically 1.0 lol

Reply0

BuyTheTop

· 01-10 06:53

I agree with not touching high leverage; too many people die from leverage. However, a monthly yield of 50% seems a bit exaggerated. How is this number calculated? Steady arbitrage sounds good, but how many people can actually execute it? 68K to 2 million in three months, this goal is a bit aggressive, brother. It sounds good, but ultimately it depends on whether it can be achieved later. Results speak for themselves.

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_survivor

· 01-10 06:52

Stable growth is easy to talk about, but sticking with it is the real skill. Low leverage should be played this way.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrying

· 01-10 06:46

From 4000U to 68W, this growth rate is indeed steady. However, the target of 50% monthly return sounds a bit unrealistic.

View OriginalReply0

alpha_leaker

· 01-10 06:46

The robust arbitrage strategy is indeed reliable, but the jump from 680,000 to 2,000,000 is a bit too large. Can it really follow the curve?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoNomics

· 01-10 06:39

actually, if you're claiming 50% monthly returns at scale, the math doesn't check out. correlation matrix between leverage avoidance and 200WU AUM by q1 suggests survivorship bias is doing heavy lifting here. statistically significant or just... lucky?

Reply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-10 06:33

To be honest, not using leverage really hit home for me. So many people around me have lost everything in a single greedy move, completely undoing their previous efforts—it's truly heartbreaking.

View OriginalReply0

StopLossMaster

· 01-10 06:25

Low leverage is indeed the key to longevity, but can the span from 680,000 to 2,000,000 truly keep the rhythm steady? It sounds easy to avoid chasing gains and selling losses, but when the large capital pool grows big, slippage issues tend to occur. How is this handled?

View OriginalReply0