2026-01-09 20:22:56

Recently, I have read a lot about the Walrus protocol, and the idea behind this project is indeed interesting. In simple terms, it is a decentralized storage and data marketplace solution built for AI and Web3 developers.

What exactly can it do? It provides storage services for large files like NFTs, game assets, and AI datasets, with low costs and high usability. On the technical level, it uses data sharding and redundancy mechanisms, so even if some nodes fail, data will not be lost, ensuring durability.

The WAL token plays three roles in this system: paying for storage fees, node staking, and on-chain governance. It essentially turns storage capacity—an intangible resource—into a tradable on-chain asset.

The underlying logic is not hard to understand— as AI model training and on-chain applications demand more data, the market will inevitably need infrastructure that can guarantee performance while maintaining true decentralization. Walrus’s positioning in this regard is quite clear.

WAL3,17%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropDreamer

· 15h ago

Damn, the Walrus idea is really brilliant. Data sharding with redundancy is truly a necessity. But will the WAL token become the next worthless coin? Let's wait and see. The storage market is indeed huge, but with so many competitors, breaking through is the key. It feels like Filecoin was also hyped up like this back then. Everyone knows how it turned out now. I like this logic, but we need to wait for real application data to make a judgment. Whether WAL can break 0.1 is already a question; don't be too optimistic, haha.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWanderingPoet

· 01-10 08:54

Storage is really a tough challenge in Web3, and the Walrus solution seems to have some potential.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 01-09 20:52

Sounds good, but the WAL token logic is a bit complicated. Can it really be implemented? Low cost is one thing, but nowadays everyone claims their prices are cheap. The key is how stable it is. Sharding + redundancy sounds appealing, but in actual operation, can node stability really be guaranteed? Feels like the same old trick, just a different name. Oh wait, this storage solution does have a real demand for AI training data. Building such infrastructure, could it become a new data oligopoly? If the WAL token can handle payments, staking, and governance all in one, liquidity should be good. But honestly, compared to IPFS and Arweave, what’s the differentiation of Walrus? Performance assurance is crucial, but I haven't seen real data from the testnet. My biggest concern with projects like this is an unreasonable token release plan, which could lead to a crash.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiVeteran

· 01-09 20:52

Are there new players in the storage track again? The strategy of sharding plus redundancy is now everywhere. The key is whether it can really run smoothly without dropping the chain.

View OriginalReply0

GlueGuy

· 01-09 20:51

Oops, someone is finally taking data sharding seriously, but can WAL's token economics really hold up... I've heard many times that storage costs are low, but the key is whether nodes will run away. Basically, it's about wanting to do Web3 cloud storage, but decentralization does not equal cheap. It really depends on the actual user base. The staking governance system feels like another DAO governance theater—are we betting or not... If Walrus can truly solve the durability issue of large file storage, AI training costs could be significantly reduced.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOSapien

· 01-09 20:41

Decentralized storage is really about to take off. I like the Walrus approach, but I'm just worried that the node operation and maintenance costs might be underestimated.

View OriginalReply0