When it comes to building sustainable blockchain infrastructure, early participant feedback beats everything else. Sure, token distribution sounds exciting on paper—but real insights? Those come from LPs and stakers who've actually deployed capital and experienced the system firsthand. What would they rebuild differently? Where are the friction points? That's the gold standard for designing base layers that actually work. Any chain serious about hitting mainstream adoption can't just rely on incentive mechanisms. You need to listen hard to the people running real operations. They're the ones who'll tell you what truly needs fixing. That's how robust infrastructure emerges.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeNightmare
· 01-10 17:06
Sounds very right, but really, the biggest pain point for LPs and stakers is the gas fee... When I was monitoring the market late at night, I was thinking that no matter how good the incentives are, they can't withstand the moment when gwei surges.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 01-09 19:05
LPs and stakers' complaints are indeed more valuable than the white paper... The real pain points are all in these people's words.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedNotStirred
· 01-09 19:05
Listening to this, it feels like the person writing this article has never actually talked to a real LP... Otherwise, why do these theoretical types always talk so confidently? I think it mainly depends on the market slapping them in the face to make a change.
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorer
· 01-09 18:51
Sounds good, but the problem is that most projects simply don't listen...
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 01-09 18:40
Nah sounds right, but in reality, most projects don't listen to user feedback at all; they just want to quickly suck blood.
When it comes to building sustainable blockchain infrastructure, early participant feedback beats everything else. Sure, token distribution sounds exciting on paper—but real insights? Those come from LPs and stakers who've actually deployed capital and experienced the system firsthand. What would they rebuild differently? Where are the friction points? That's the gold standard for designing base layers that actually work. Any chain serious about hitting mainstream adoption can't just rely on incentive mechanisms. You need to listen hard to the people running real operations. They're the ones who'll tell you what truly needs fixing. That's how robust infrastructure emerges.