The recently released December US employment data shows an interesting contradictory phenomenon. On the surface, the unemployment rate of 4.4% fell below expectations, and the previous figure was also revised downward. Non-farm payrolls increased by only 50,000, but at least there was no deterioration in unemployment. However, a closer look reveals that the data for the previous two months was significantly revised—November's unemployment rate was raised to 4.5%, and non-farm payrolls were cut from the earlier estimate to 56,000.



What does this indicate? Nominal figures are indeed stable, but the underlying employment market has been weakening all along. Looking only at December's unemployment rate and non-farm payrolls can be misleading, but considering the downward revision for November, you can see the true picture of declining employment momentum.

For traders focused on macroeconomic cycles, this signal is very important—when the employment market begins to show this "good-looking numbers, but actual weakness" contrast, it often indicates that economic growth momentum is waning. Such data can influence central bank policy directions and, in turn, affect the performance of risk assets. While it may not trigger panic in the short term, sustained weakening of employment data over the long term can easily raise market concerns about growth prospects.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SocialAnxietyStakervip
· 01-10 14:28
It's that same old trick of "pretty data but actually disappointing." I told you these numbers would eventually be exposed.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleepervip
· 01-09 18:00
The data is a slap in the face; on the surface, it's stable, but behind the scenes, it's been bleeding all along.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 01-09 18:00
Data is being revised downward; this is the real truth. It appears stable but is actually weakening.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWalletvip
· 01-09 17:57
It's the same old trick of "good-looking numbers but poor fundamentals," I'm used to it already.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofstervip
· 01-09 17:53
nah, the real signal's in the revisions, not the headline numbers. classic misdirection.
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)