Many people still simply understand privacy as "anonymity," but Dusk Network is taking a different approach — using zero-knowledge proofs to enable privacy and compliance to coexist.
This may sound contradictory, but in the current regulatory environment, it is crucial. Why is it difficult for traditional finance to go on-chain? The fundamental reason is the deadlock between privacy and auditability. You are either completely anonymous (no one can audit), or fully transparent (no privacy).
Dusk's innovation lies in its optional disclosure mechanism. In other words, institutions can protect user privacy while demonstrating to regulators that they are compliant. This is not about resisting regulation but about achieving privacy within a regulatory framework. Because of this feature, it has become one of the few public blockchains designed for traditional assets like securities, bonds, and RWA.
From a longer-term perspective, truly scalable applications are likely not those systems that claim to be fully anonymous, but rather infrastructure like this that is "privacy-first and compliance-flexible." If you are not chasing short-term market movements but thinking about the long-term industry direction, this approach is indeed worth exploring.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoTherapist
· 20h ago
ngl this is lowkey the real cope narrative we need to hear rn. everyone's still stuck in the "privacy = pure anonymity" psychological trap, totally missing the institutional play dusk is actually running here.
Reply0
MEVHunterZhang
· 01-09 14:50
Zero-knowledge proofs sound very advanced, but basically it's "I can prove I'm right without revealing the details," which pretty much fits the appetite of the regulators.
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 01-09 14:49
This is the true middle ground, not compromise but wisdom.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssues
· 01-09 14:45
Zero-knowledge proofs are truly amazing; finally, someone has explained privacy and compliance thoroughly.
---
Compliance is the future passport; those purely anonymous projects will eventually fail.
---
That's why I am optimistic about Dusk. Not following the hype makes it more solid.
---
The optional disclosure design is really clever—allowing freedom while avoiding being targeted. That's it.
---
Honestly, I was burned once by anonymous coins before, and now I trust this "gray scale" approach even more.
---
RWA on-chain will eventually rely on this kind of solution to break through; otherwise, traditional institutions will never come in.
---
Zero-knowledge proofs sound complex, but they are basically "I won't say anything but can prove I am fine," perfect.
---
Regulation and innovation reconcile; it sounds like a dream, but Dusk seems to be actually doing this.
---
Long-term holders should pay more attention to this kind of infrastructure rather than chasing short-term price fluctuations every day.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermit
· 01-09 14:29
This is the right way. Privacy and compliance are not mutually exclusive.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e87b21ee
· 01-09 14:26
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed ingenious, but honestly, most people still can't understand them.
Dusk's approach has some merit; compliance and privacy don't have to be mutually exclusive.
When RWA truly explodes, we'll know who's right.
Another "next-generation infrastructure," whether you believe it or not.
This is what Web3 should look like—no more constant battles with regulators.
Many people still simply understand privacy as "anonymity," but Dusk Network is taking a different approach — using zero-knowledge proofs to enable privacy and compliance to coexist.
This may sound contradictory, but in the current regulatory environment, it is crucial. Why is it difficult for traditional finance to go on-chain? The fundamental reason is the deadlock between privacy and auditability. You are either completely anonymous (no one can audit), or fully transparent (no privacy).
Dusk's innovation lies in its optional disclosure mechanism. In other words, institutions can protect user privacy while demonstrating to regulators that they are compliant. This is not about resisting regulation but about achieving privacy within a regulatory framework. Because of this feature, it has become one of the few public blockchains designed for traditional assets like securities, bonds, and RWA.
From a longer-term perspective, truly scalable applications are likely not those systems that claim to be fully anonymous, but rather infrastructure like this that is "privacy-first and compliance-flexible." If you are not chasing short-term market movements but thinking about the long-term industry direction, this approach is indeed worth exploring.