Why do I still add GIGGLE to my watchlist even though the chart is "bleeding"? Here are 3 purely technical reasons:



1. Mathematical Scarcity: With a total supply of only 1,000,000 tokens, GIGGLE doesn't play the "dusting" game like meme tokens with trillions of supply. If the market cap reaches 1B$, the price per token would be 1,000$. This is more of a "Blue-chip" price structure rather than a typical meme.

2. Actual Burn Mechanism (Real Yield): Unlike "virtual burning," GIGGLE burns based on actual transaction fees from Binance. The recent Batch 2 recorded ~3,300 tokens removed. The lower the price, the faster the burn rate per USD fee. This is a highly intelligent self-balancing supply mechanism.

3. On-chain "Silence": Top 2 wallet (0x68...) still holds 2.3% of the total supply from the $50 range, never selling a single token at the $285 peak. When the "big players" haven't exited, the game isn't over.

GIGGLE is in the "filtering" phase of weak hands (weak hands). The $68-$70 range is an excellent risk/reward observation point (R:R) for a mid-term position.

#giggle #BSC #Binance #CryptoAnalysis #Tokenomics
SAO-0,86%
GIGGLE6,03%
TOKEN1,74%
XCH-1,78%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)