A lot of people in the community are calling out what they see as one of the biggest strategic missteps in Ethereum's development journey. When you look at some of the core decisions made by the founding team, this particular move stands out as a call that didn't age well. The ripple effects across the ecosystem make you wonder about the reasoning behind it.

ETH-0,56%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityLarryvip
· 01-07 21:13
Well... ultimately, that decision back then really was a letdown, and now it seems a bit embarrassing.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManagervip
· 01-07 02:55
Everyone who held onto their chips could see it; that initial move was indeed poor, and now the entire ecosystem is suffering from the aftermath of that decision. However, the true winners had already anticipated this through on-chain analysis, and that's exactly how I approached it.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnonvip
· 01-07 02:50
ngl, this decision really dragged things down; it should have been changed earlier.
View OriginalReply0
LayoffMinervip
· 01-07 02:34
Hmm... this decision is really a bit disappointing; I should have reflected on it a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)