2026-01-06 16:26:23

The significance of Brevis ($BREV) goes beyond the technology of zero-knowledge proofs itself; it directly addresses the long-standing core issues faced by the Ethereum ecosystem: high computational costs and slow verification speeds.

On January 6th, Brevis will be launched simultaneously on several leading exchanges. This timing is no coincidence but marks a key milestone in the project's development.

Looking back at Ethereum's various scaling solutions, they all essentially aim to do the same thing—"compute less." However, Brevis opens another door: instead of reducing the amount of computation, it changes who is responsible for verification. The full computational process is preserved, but not every network participant needs to repeat the calculations. This shift in approach unlocks a completely different possibility for scaling.

BREV-3,96%

ETH0,06%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WagmiAnon

· 01-09 16:10

It's not about reducing the amount of computation, but about changing the verification method? That sounds interesting. This might be the correct way to scale.

View OriginalReply0

VirtualRichDream

· 01-09 10:43

Alright, Brevis's approach is indeed different. Changing the verification method is smarter than simply reducing computation power. Can this really solve Ethereum's bottleneck? Let's wait and see after it goes live. Decentralized verification but can the costs really come down? I'm a bit skeptical. Zero-knowledge proofs and scalability—can this combo pack make a real impact?

View OriginalReply0

HodlVeteran

· 01-08 06:11

Bro, I’m just telling the truth. I’ve listened to this expansion plan more than ten times. Last time was the same story, and look what happened... Never mind, I won’t say more. It also reminds me of getting trapped in 2018. It’s launching on January 6th, right? Let’s see if it’s another round of a buying frenzy. --- Who will verify the changes? Fine, I just want to know who will ultimately foot the bill. The front-runners say nice things, but the latecomers suffer huge losses—tell me the truth. --- Zero-knowledge proofs have been hyped for so many years. I have just one question—how many of them are actually usable? Before going all-in, check if your wallet is enough. --- Once again, multiple leading exchanges are launching simultaneously... I can guess the pattern behind this even with my eyes closed. Newbies, it’s best to keep some rationality. --- Just listen, don’t take it seriously. I’ve seen too many scaling solutions for Ethereum over the years, some have already become lessons from history. --- Keep the full calculation process intact, don’t recalculate... Sounds good, but who bears the cost? Anyone who has played knows—ultimately, retail investors foot the bill.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMortgage

· 01-06 16:53

Forget it, forget it. Once again, a new idea that changes the game. Is this time really different? But speaking of which, when it launched on January 6, was it just to cut leeks or was there truly solid technology backing it up? Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 01-06 16:51

Hmm... changing the verification method instead of reducing computation, this logic is indeed a bit different. But can it really be implemented? Hopefully not just empty talk. Launching so many exchanges on January 6th, the smell of a Ponzi scheme is quite strong. Algorithm optimization is a common topic; will this time truly solve the problem of gas fee explosion? Let's wait and see. There are so many Ethereum scaling solutions; why is Brevis different? Just talking nicely. Everyone verifying is indeed a pain point, but how to ensure decentralization? It feels like a trade-off. This is the real breakthrough. Previously, everyone was thinking about how to do less calculation; now, changing the perspective has completely shifted the overall approach.

View OriginalReply0

TrustMeBro

· 01-06 16:51

Hey, this idea does have some merit. Changing the verification method instead of simply reducing the computational load sounds feasible.

View OriginalReply0

zkProofGremlin

· 01-06 16:42

I did the math, and this approach is indeed brilliant. Instead of blindly cutting down the computation, assigning someone else to handle verification is the real breakthrough.

View OriginalReply0