2026-01-06 09:24:57

This is the meaning of resilience. From a market cap of 3,000 to 70,000, every step has been filled with pitfalls—pre-sale official account banned, encountering trading difficulties on multiple platforms after launch, global outages disrupting the game plan, and being scammed by some big V influencers who forcibly dumped large amounts of chips. It may look embarrassing, but in fact, it is fighting against the dark forest law.

Tired of the routines of running away, watering, and mutual leek-cutting. What this project wants is very simple—a community that is resilient, optimistic, and sincere. Not to create a wealth myth, but to build a different ecological temperament. Moving slowly, but never stopping.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVSandwich

· 15h ago

Surviving so many pitfalls, you must be pretty tough, but honestly, I've heard this set of words quite a few times.

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticOracle

· 01-07 10:38

Is this the same narrative again? Repackaging the same messes we've been through as "resilience"? But then again, going from 3,000 to 70,000 is no joke. Talking nicely doesn't compare to actually surviving, and I'm watching. In today's world, not跑路 (running away) is already a win, nothing more to say. Is the community sincere? First, let's see those who were scammed get compensated. Taking it slow is fine, but don't make it sound like some great mission—it's just about staying alive. Getting knocked down and still standing up—I'll admit, that really shows something.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSherlockGirl

· 01-06 09:55

30,000 to 70,000? Bro, I've seen this script before, just worried that it might reverse from 70,000 back down to 3 bucks. Whether a big V dumps the market depends on on-chain data—whose wallet is selling. Based on my analysis, this is the real key to watch. Honestly, the word "resilience" is getting a bit tired. The real question is whether the community is actually adding funds or just talking about it.

View OriginalReply0

gaslight_gasfeez

· 01-06 09:50

Wow, I've seen this tactic too many times, now talking about resilience again? Honestly, going from 3,000 to 70,000 sounds impressive, but do I believe this is real resilience or just another wave of harvesting... But on the other hand, not running away definitely makes it worth a look, at least more conscientious than those who disappear after preheating. Wait, surviving after being attacked by a big V? Then I need to reassess. This ecosystem's vibe relies on words, but how can it be proven? I just want to see if the project team is really still working, instead of just posting copy and storytelling all day.

View OriginalReply0

SchrödingersNode

· 01-06 09:26

I can only say that surviving through so many pitfalls is truly a testament to resilience. Not blowing smoke or blackening, much better than those who run away after one or two issues. From 3,000 to 70,000, it sounds simple, but every detail comes at a bloody cost. This kind of community is worth sticking with, not chasing wealth dreams but betting on genuine sincerity. Slowly but surely, without abandoning the project, that in itself is a win.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoMom