Venice's DIEM token experiment design is worth dissecting.
The background is straightforward: AI computation costs are soaring. How can users access high-quality models more cheaply? Venice came up with an idea in September—by staking DIEM tokens, users can access all AI models on the platform for free.
The mechanism works like this: holding 1 DIEM is equivalent to a $1 daily renewal quota. It sounds simple, but the logic is interesting—stakers shift from marginal cost to zero cost. In other words, the computational cost is directly offset on the user side.
The clever part of this design is that it transforms the cost of computing resources into token holder rights. It’s no longer the traditional "pay-per-use," but "holding tokens grants rights." For the project team, this locks in long-term token holders; for users, the risk is transferred to token price fluctuations.
From a tokenomics perspective, whether this model can achieve sustainable growth depends mainly on whether Venice's computing power supply can keep up with demand growth.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingersFOMO
· 01-07 09:01
In plain terms, it's just shifting the cost onto the coin price—it's a gambler's game.
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 01-06 08:56
Holding coins at zero cost is fun, but who will foot the bill when the coin price crashes to nothing later?
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Bandit
· 01-06 08:50
ngl this feels like shifting computation costs onto token holders' balance sheets... the real question is whether diem's price stays put or gets rekt when demand doesn't match the hype
Reply0
NeverVoteOnDAO
· 01-06 08:44
Holding coins at zero cost sounds good, but I just want to ask—can Venice's computing power really hold up? Isn't this just shifting the cost onto the tokens?
View OriginalReply0
DefiEngineerJack
· 01-06 08:44
nah actually™ if you dig into the mechanics here, shifting compute costs to token volatility risk is... not exactly the move. users just holding bags while Venice absorbs the real expense? fundamentally unsustainable without actual unit economics backing it
Reply0
AirdropChaser
· 01-06 08:39
Holding coins to use AI for free sounds great, but honestly, it's just passing the cost onto the coin price, gambling, right?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 01-06 08:36
This logic seems perfect, but if the computing power can't keep up, it's game over.
Venice's DIEM token experiment design is worth dissecting.
The background is straightforward: AI computation costs are soaring. How can users access high-quality models more cheaply? Venice came up with an idea in September—by staking DIEM tokens, users can access all AI models on the platform for free.
The mechanism works like this: holding 1 DIEM is equivalent to a $1 daily renewal quota. It sounds simple, but the logic is interesting—stakers shift from marginal cost to zero cost. In other words, the computational cost is directly offset on the user side.
The clever part of this design is that it transforms the cost of computing resources into token holder rights. It’s no longer the traditional "pay-per-use," but "holding tokens grants rights." For the project team, this locks in long-term token holders; for users, the risk is transferred to token price fluctuations.
From a tokenomics perspective, whether this model can achieve sustainable growth depends mainly on whether Venice's computing power supply can keep up with demand growth.