Last night around 2-3 am, the market completed a typical shakeout move by the big players—achieving two goals through rapid fluctuations: first, clearing out floating positions; second, trapping some short positions. From the bullish perspective, this shakeout has basically been completed, many retail traders have been shaken out, and market sentiment has been released.



I personally opened a long position at 16.93, and my account has already been eroded by 162 USDT in fees, effectively lowering my cost basis to 16.1. There's an interesting phenomenon here—the design of the funding rate settled every hour actually creates a natural asymmetry between long and short positions.

Let's do a simple probability model: assuming a 50% chance of price going up or down, with a 0.5 increase or decrease in the next hour. If a long position wins, the profit is the actual price difference, with fees continuing to eat into the cost, but overall still profitable. The problem lies with the shorts—even if they win, half of their earnings must be paid out to cover funding fees, which effectively cuts the gains from short positions by half.

Looking at the profit ratio from another angle: the expected profit for longs is 75%, while for shorts it's only 25%. This isn't just market randomness but a result of the contract design's cost structure. For traders, understanding this fee mechanism is more important than simply chasing price movements.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-a180694bvip
· 01-07 03:14
The fee structure indeed subtly suppresses the short sellers' profits, no wonder it always feels like going short is easily cut off.
View OriginalReply0
GasBankruptervip
· 01-07 02:49
Fee rates are just bloodsucking; it feels like the exchange takes all the profits after you make them. Short positions are really screwed by the system design; no wonder everyone is going long. This analysis is thorough, but I still believe I can break even through luck haha. Market makers' wash trading is just harvesting; retail investors can't escape. Entering long at 16.93 is ridiculous; it should have been obvious someone was up to something. The fee rate mechanism is a complete trap; the designers are probably laughing secretly. So going long is like mysticism; the odds are fixed, what are you still betting on? That's why most people lose money—the rules themselves are inherently unfair. Losing 162 USDT, brother, your cost basis is really getting hurt. Funding rates are just financial plunder; there's nothing to argue about.
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorkingvip
· 01-06 07:58
The fee structure is indeed a hidden trap; short sellers deserve to be liquidated.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuyvip
· 01-06 07:58
Fee structure design is indeed a hidden money grab, and heavy losses for short sellers are well justified.
View OriginalReply0
GweiObservervip
· 01-06 07:56
The fee mechanism is indeed a hidden money grab, no wonder it's so hard for the bears to survive.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketHustlervip
· 01-06 07:50
Fees are really the invisible way to cut the leeks; smart people have seen through it long ago. --- Alright, I respect your probability model. The natural advantage of the bulls is indeed built into the design. --- Entered at 16.93? Bro, your luck is on point. I got wiped out that day. --- Shorts deserve it; the contract pool never left us a way out. --- Explaining the fee mechanism thoroughly is much more reliable than those signal callers. --- It's common for retail traders to be kicked out; get used to it. --- This kind of hidden cost is the most painful, even more than liquidation. --- Long positions really are a free win; the design logic favors the bulls. --- Wait, still making 162 USDT after fees? How much does it need to rise to break even? --- The water in the contract is deeper than you think. Understanding the mechanism is key to surviving longer.
View OriginalReply0
VitaliksTwinvip
· 01-06 07:36
Fees are indeed the enemy of bears; going long is a guaranteed win.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580vip
· 01-06 07:36
Fees are really not fair... Data shows that shorts are being systematically cut, but I still have to keep operating this way. Wait a bit longer and see if I can recover this 162U in the next settlement. I've always managed to get through before hitting historical lows.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetectorvip
· 01-06 07:32
Amazing, this fee rate mechanism is indeed a natural bullish factor. Shorts are losing money and still have to pay, who would do such a trade? The fee rate design is like an invisible market maker, even more ruthless than a shakeout. Entered at 16.93, lost 162U but still maintaining this mindset, I’m amazed. The key is to understand the rules; don’t foolishly trade blindly based on price fluctuations.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)