2026-01-06 06:23:09

ARK Invest is making big moves again. This well-known investment firm recently purchased Bitcoin worth $36 million in one go, further confirming traditional financial institutions' continued optimism about BTC.

As traders who pay attention to market trends, large-scale institutional purchases like this often send positive signals — they reflect professional funds' assessment of Bitcoin's long-term value. ARK Invest's past actions often trigger attention and discussion in the crypto market.

BTC0,12%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HodlKumamon

· 01-09 03:19

Xiongxiong just checked the historical data, and the risk-reward ratio of ARK's recent buy-in points is indeed quite good... But how much does 36 million represent relative to their total market cap?

View OriginalReply0

MevShadowranger

· 01-07 11:31

36 million to buy BTC, this pace is a bit fierce, do institutions really not fear? ARK is again bottom-fishing, well, retail investors like us should still follow and eat some soup. What does an institutional-level move indicate? Is BTC really about to take off? But speaking of which, 36 million is nothing for ARK... Hey, if this wave really takes off, we need to catch up quickly. Institutions increasing their positions, should we buy along? Is this logic reliable? What does ARK's move signify? Honestly, it's all about whether it can break previous highs; just buying isn't enough. Retail investors looking at this news must feel so distressed. This is true institutional manipulation; let's wait and enjoy the positive news.

View OriginalReply0

TokenSherpa

· 01-06 06:53

actually, let me break this down... ark's $36m buys are nice and all, but if you examine the voting patterns on their fund governance, they're still pretty centralized compared to actual on-chain protocols. historically speaking, institutional capital flows don't correlate 1:1 with price action the way everyone thinks. just saying, the tokenomics framework matters more than headlines

Reply0

airdrop_whisperer