2026-01-05 18:28:28

JupUSD starts from security. The project adopts Porto (provided by Anchorage Digital) to implement an institutional-level self-custody solution, which is crucial for users seeking asset autonomy. The code is fully open source, which itself demonstrates transparency. More importantly, it has passed audits by three independent auditing firms—Offside Labs, Guardian Audits, and Pashov Audit Group—each providing an audit report. This combination (self-custody + open source + multi-party audits) essentially addresses users' core concerns about the security of stablecoins.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

staking_gramps

· 01-08 16:48

Hmm, self-custody + open source + triple audits, this combination does have some substance. But ultimately, stablecoins still depend on user experience. --- Porto sounds good, but I wonder if using it will involve a bunch of complicated operations. --- All three audits have passed? Alright, at least it's more reliable than some projects. --- I can't understand the open source code, but at least daring to open source shows they have confidence. --- Autonomy is appealing, but most users actually don't care about that; they just want stability and ease of use. --- Multiple audits sound very secure, but whether the auditing agencies themselves are reliable is also a concern. --- It seems like Web3 projects are all touting security, but JupUSD's approach is relatively solid.

View OriginalReply0

StakeOrRegret

· 01-08 12:47

Triple auditing plus self-custody, this combination really costs... Anchorage Digital's endorsement is also quite interesting.

View OriginalReply0

YieldHunter

· 01-07 06:59

three audits sounds good on paper, but like... did they actually stress test the peg under extreme conditions? that's the real question nobody asks

Reply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 01-05 18:58

Self-custody + open source + triple review, this combination is indeed solid. Finally, there is a project that takes security seriously.

View OriginalReply0

LightningSentry

· 01-05 18:58

Self-custody + open source + third-party audit, this combination is indeed powerful. But as for the specifics of the audit report, you'll need to review it yourself.

View OriginalReply0

CounterIndicator

· 01-05 18:56

Self-custody + open source + third-party audits, this combination is indeed solid. But whether the audit agency is reliable depends on how it is used afterward.

View OriginalReply0

LightningPacketLoss

· 01-05 18:51

Self-custody + open source + multiple audits, this combination is indeed powerful. Finally, I see projects taking security seriously.

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessApe

· 01-05 18:34

Have all three audits passed? Alright, it seems like they really put in effort this time.

View OriginalReply0