The recent trend of PIPPIN is quite intriguing. The live trading account was suddenly closed, and earlier market analysis articles were also deleted. Shortly after, the coin price started to come under pressure and decline. It dropped from 0.376 to 0.35. Although the decline isn't particularly dramatic, the timing is indeed very coincidental.
Looking at the trading data, the average holding cost for the big players is around 0.376. This wave of decline actually puts significant short-term unrealized loss pressure on them. But the question is—if the sell-off was purely caused by market pressure, then the coincidence of timing is a bit too perfect.
Recalling previous manipulation tactics, there was an emergency addition of 6 million in margin in the morning, and by evening, there was a spike to 0.76. Is the current situation a kind of replica? On the surface, it appears different participants are acting independently, but such a high level of coordination is hard to ignore, which naturally fuels retail investors' suspicions. In any case, in such a highly uncertain market environment, chasing the high definitely carries greater risk.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
degenwhisperer
· 01-08 11:33
This timing is too weird. After deleting articles and closing accounts, they start to attack. I wonder how coincidental this must be.
Even with the market maker's floating loss, they still dare to do this. Are they not afraid that retail investors will completely run away?
Adding margin in the morning and then pulling the price down in the evening, and now this again? It looks like a repeat of the same script. Do they have to be so obvious?
But to be honest, I really don't dare to chase the current market. The risk is written all over it.
This move feels a bit suspicious. Let's just watch and see.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 01-07 14:16
Hmm... Accounts are closed just like that, articles are deleted on a whim, the rhythm is really impressive.
Is this trying to shake out retail investors? I just want to see how it will play out next.
The timing is so tightly controlled, who would believe it?
Wait and see, I won't dare chase the high anymore.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedTwice
· 01-05 17:52
Account closure + article deletion + market manipulation, this combo punch is too coordinated. Can't you be a little less obvious, buddy?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 01-05 17:51
Account closure, article deletion, price drops... the sequence of these actions is so clever, it feels like even a scriptwriter wouldn't dare to write it this way.
Retail investors deserve to be harvested? Chasing the high now is just sending your head to be cut off.
It's the same old trick again, just switching to a different coin to continue the scam.
Wait, will it really crash this time? I can't quite understand it.
Even when the market maker is floating in loss, they still dump the market; in the end, we're the ones who get hurt.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 01-05 17:46
The timing is too coincidental to be a coincidence; it's a signal.
Closing accounts and deleting articles—this combination of moves is a bit too obvious.
Real whales should hide even deeper; such flashy operations have actually exposed them.
Not chasing, not chasing, let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 01-05 17:39
The timing is so coincidental—account suddenly closed, article deleted, and the coin crashes... This combo punch is really strong.
Account closure + article disappearance = the iron fist is coming?
It's the old routine—first attract funds, then dump the market, retail investors once again win passively... No, it's just lying flat.
Feels like this move isn't that simple, I'm not chasing, just watching and observing.
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmiling
· 01-05 17:33
Account deletion, margin addition, perfect timing... I have memorized this entire set of actions.
Anyway, I don't chase highs; I'll wait until the drop is over.
This move looks too muddy; retail investors entering are just being harvested.
The recent trend of PIPPIN is quite intriguing. The live trading account was suddenly closed, and earlier market analysis articles were also deleted. Shortly after, the coin price started to come under pressure and decline. It dropped from 0.376 to 0.35. Although the decline isn't particularly dramatic, the timing is indeed very coincidental.
Looking at the trading data, the average holding cost for the big players is around 0.376. This wave of decline actually puts significant short-term unrealized loss pressure on them. But the question is—if the sell-off was purely caused by market pressure, then the coincidence of timing is a bit too perfect.
Recalling previous manipulation tactics, there was an emergency addition of 6 million in margin in the morning, and by evening, there was a spike to 0.76. Is the current situation a kind of replica? On the surface, it appears different participants are acting independently, but such a high level of coordination is hard to ignore, which naturally fuels retail investors' suspicions. In any case, in such a highly uncertain market environment, chasing the high definitely carries greater risk.