I think the current logic of oak planks is very good. This is for the long-term interests of all consensus participants. Although I am a novice, I still have some understanding of normal profit-making logic. Everyone can think about it—anything that is overly common is usually cheap and not worth much. As the saying goes, rarity makes something valuable. If we all rush in and sell coins collectively, where will the good prices come from? We might even cause a market crash. Since we are in the primary market, we already hold a significant advantage. In other words, the project team is now developing steadily with a win-win goal. First, they protect us, the primary market coin holders. When the market stabilizes and prices rise, they will gradually release coins according to the contract. At that time, you only need to sell a small amount of coins to potentially earn a big profit. Won’t you be able to recover your investment? We are aiming for long-term profits, not temporary gains. If you sell all your coins now, what will you use to make money? How is that different from a short-term Ponzi scheme? So, holding onto coins is difficult. If those who played Bitcoin back then could hold a few coins, isn’t that also a significant asset now? We shouldn’t be impatient; we need to think long-term. Don’t let our invested projects become fleeting and be destroyed by our own hands. If the project team releases all coins now, that would be irresponsible. Your coins could instantly become worthless because they have already made a profit, and we haven’t recouped ours yet, right? So, they are definitely aiming for a win-win situation. You should know—they’re not doing charity; they want to make more money and gain fame. We’re just earning a little bit of their "drizzle." So, there’s no need to worry excessively about withdrawal issues. We will always get a share, haha.