2026-01-03 06:25:39

Can someone explain the potential impact of the delisting of the FLOW/BTC trading pair? What does it specifically mean? It seems that this has no obvious effect on the spot trading of FLOW/USDT.

Regarding the DOGS token, its coin-margined futures contract has also been delisted. What are the reasons behind this? Does delisting contract products have a significant impact on the entire USDT-margined futures trading? From the perspective of trading activity, the ripple effect doesn't seem very noticeable.

Could experienced friends explain the actual impact of trading pair and contract delisting on different types of traders?

FLOW7,13%

BTC-1,74%

DOGS-2,94%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CoinBasedThinking

· 01-05 18:18

In simple terms, liquidity has been dispersed. Getting used to delisting small coin trading pairs is nothing new; most people have already migrated to USDT. You need to see through the tricks in the crypto world. Delisting trading pairs ≈ traffic transfer, and the real impact is on those quant traders who rely on small pairs for arbitrage. I'm not surprised about the delisting of DOGS contracts. These new tokens are inherently hype-driven; it's better to cut them off than to maintain garbage liquidity. On the other hand, U-based stablecoins are as solid as a rock, while the coin-based system is getting more and more murky. Who still cares about these delisting news? It’s about time for a cleanup.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropNinja

· 01-04 23:05

To be honest, the delisting of trading pairs doesn't have much impact on retail investors. Mainly, liquidity gets dispersed, and big players might need to operate on several platforms. On the FLOW side, delisting from BTC trading still allows trading with USDT, so it's not a big deal—it's just the exchange doing risk control. The delisting of DOGS coin-margined contracts is probably due to poor trading volume, and the exchange finds it troublesome. Anyway, U-margined contracts are still active, and the big players don't care about these minor fluctuations. Frankly, this is just the exchange cleaning up junk assets, nothing mysterious about it. The delisting of contracts isn't that exaggerated unless you rely heavily on a specific trading pair. Otherwise, you can just switch to another method to continue trading. The key still depends on market depth; otherwise, having more trading pairs is pointless. What does this kind of delisting indicate? The crypto world is undergoing "survival of the fittest"—not all coins can last forever.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractRebel

· 01-03 06:55

Basically, it's just liquidity dispersion. It doesn't affect retail investors much, but market makers find it uncomfortable. That wave of DOGS was actually the exchange cleaning up trash tokens. Who cares anyway, since everyone is playing on U-based contracts.

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Whisperer

· 01-03 06:47

To be honest, removing trading pairs doesn't affect the spot market's cake at all; it's mainly contract traders getting liquidated. The FLOW token was delisted due to poor liquidity and high trading costs. I think the delisting of DOGS on the coin-margined side is actually a good thing; the activity on the U-margined side hasn't decreased at all, indicating that the market has already diversified.

View OriginalReply0