Many traders are currently preparing to short or have already opened short positions. But before taking action, perhaps it's worth asking oneself a question: what is the actual logic behind shorting now?
If the answer is "a bear market has arrived, only short and not long," then I agree with this mindset. But let's review history: from March 2024's 73,800 to September's 52,500, it was just a weekly-level correction within a bull market. Looking at January to April 2025, from 110,000 down to 74,500, it was also a weekly adjustment within the bull market framework. Holding onto short positions now is essentially betting on a weekly rebound, so be mentally prepared.
If the answer is "it has risen too much and should fall," then let's do some calculations. How much has it fallen from 126,000 to now? Is it so outrageous to drop below 100,000? Or from another perspective, rising from 80,600 to the current level, the total increase isn't that exaggerated. Comparing mid-December's 84,500 to now, the increase is also moderate.
I once opened a short at a very high level, setting the take-profit at 82,500, and successfully exited. In contrast, many people's operations: going long at 110,000 and getting trapped, still trapped at 100,000. Now that it's fallen to over 80,000, they want to rebound to 90,000 and short again. Isn't this repeating previous mistakes?
Of course, falling to 80,000 or even 85,000 is possible. But the key is to position long at low levels. For example, allocate 1% of your position at 85,000, and 2% at 80,000. No matter how deep the decline, the January rhythm is about gradually building positions at the bottom, not rushing to short at the first rebound. Think about it: at the current 90,000 level, is the greater probability that it will fall further to 80,000 or rebound to 100,000? The obvious answer points to the latter.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EntryPositionAnalyst
· 01-05 16:12
Uh oh, isn't it too early to be catching the bottom with a short now? You really need to clarify your logic, brother.
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 01-04 15:05
This logic really hit the mark. A few days ago, I was also debating whether to add a short position, but after seeing this, I immediately dismissed the idea.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPlumber
· 01-03 06:52
Isn't this a typical contract vulnerability exploitation chain? A group of people repeatedly making the same mistake, just like a reentrancy bug in unreviewed code—deadly.
Don't just focus on short positions; building a position at low levels is more critical than anything else. Just like contract permission control, if the position isn't right, everything else is pointless.
Right now, the probability of bouncing from 90,000 to 100,000 is indeed higher. Sticking to short positions is like deploying a contract with bugs—inevitably, you'll hit a snag.
From 73,800 to 52,500, why didn't you see it as an adjustment? You had to go short, and this mindset needs to change.
For those still holding long positions at 110,000, instead of continuing to lose, learn from the strategy of building positions in batches at 85,000 and 80,000. Review your strategy carefully before acting.
Once the take-profit point is set, it must be executed. Unlike some contracts that upgrade and change parameters arbitrarily, you guys are being indecisive...
The key is not to be controlled by the illusion that "it has risen too much and should fall." Just like formal verification of code, it must be proven with data.
View OriginalReply0
BoredApeResistance
· 01-03 06:49
That's right, I'm the kind of idiot who goes all-in on a 110000 long position, and I'm still trapped. Seeing your take profit at 82500 and smoothly exiting, I'm really jealous.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 01-03 06:48
110,000 long quilt cover, 100,000 long is still in the set, and now you want to be 90,000 short? Brother, you are reviewing your own mistakes, come on
View OriginalReply0
DefiOldTrickster
· 01-03 06:43
Haha, another group of naked shorts are there playing the price game. I saw this show back in 2019, and it's always the same group of people, only willing to sell off right before the rebound.
Really, instead of holding onto short positions, it's better to follow my approach back then—set a clear take-profit point and run, then use the remaining time to accumulate long positions at low levels for reinvestment gains. Place some at 80,000, then add more at 85,000, and let on-chain data coordinate with your positions. That's the way to survive a bear market.
Veterans from 2009 made a fortune with this routine, and it's still the same now. I just laugh when I see you guys stuck at 110,000 and still hesitating. Building positions at the bottom is the key to annualized returns.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 01-03 06:36
Haha, another argument of "it's time to fall." Who's really supposed to wake up if they keep saying this every day?
Clinging to short positions and still betting on a weekly rebound—aren't you just stubbornly arguing with yourself?
Planning long positions at low levels sounds simple. Who would dare to buy in if it really drops to 80,000? Anyway, I'm scared.
Many traders are currently preparing to short or have already opened short positions. But before taking action, perhaps it's worth asking oneself a question: what is the actual logic behind shorting now?
If the answer is "a bear market has arrived, only short and not long," then I agree with this mindset. But let's review history: from March 2024's 73,800 to September's 52,500, it was just a weekly-level correction within a bull market. Looking at January to April 2025, from 110,000 down to 74,500, it was also a weekly adjustment within the bull market framework. Holding onto short positions now is essentially betting on a weekly rebound, so be mentally prepared.
If the answer is "it has risen too much and should fall," then let's do some calculations. How much has it fallen from 126,000 to now? Is it so outrageous to drop below 100,000? Or from another perspective, rising from 80,600 to the current level, the total increase isn't that exaggerated. Comparing mid-December's 84,500 to now, the increase is also moderate.
I once opened a short at a very high level, setting the take-profit at 82,500, and successfully exited. In contrast, many people's operations: going long at 110,000 and getting trapped, still trapped at 100,000. Now that it's fallen to over 80,000, they want to rebound to 90,000 and short again. Isn't this repeating previous mistakes?
Of course, falling to 80,000 or even 85,000 is possible. But the key is to position long at low levels. For example, allocate 1% of your position at 85,000, and 2% at 80,000. No matter how deep the decline, the January rhythm is about gradually building positions at the bottom, not rushing to short at the first rebound. Think about it: at the current 90,000 level, is the greater probability that it will fall further to 80,000 or rebound to 100,000? The obvious answer points to the latter.