Human memory and AI memory mechanisms both seem to "forget," but the underlying logical differences are enormous.
During a day’s activities, the information being processed in the human brain is like an AI’s short-term context window—accessible at the moment, capable of reasoning, and finding associations, but inherently limited in capacity. The further back the information, the easier it is to accumulate, and attention begins to scatter.
Human short-term memory is more like a workbench, with a limited number of information chunks that can be stably handled—cognitive psychology typically estimates this to fluctuate between 4 and 6 "chunks." This limit is fixed; you cannot break through it. While AI’s context window also has an upper limit, the design logic behind this limit is entirely different—it’s not constrained by biological neural networks but by computational architecture.
Humans forget because the connections between neurons decay, compete, and are overwritten by new memories. AI "forgets" essentially because once the processing window is exceeded, it cannot read the previous information—next session starts anew, and the previous data truly disappears. The mechanisms of these two types of forgetting are fundamentally different.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainDoctor
· 01-05 18:48
Haha, that's why I can't remember who I talked to yesterday, but GPT can archive the entire conversation.
It's really different. The 4 to 6 chunks in the human brain are like a full hard drive, while AI is just a window; once closed, the data is gone.
Hmm, thinking this way, long-term memory might actually be the true skill of humans, right?
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMe
· 01-03 12:35
Haha, finally someone has explained this clearly. I was still arguing about it earlier.
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeart
· 01-03 08:46
Oh, I see now that the reason we forget is due to connection decay, but AI simply can't read it anymore? It seems that AI's kind of forgetting is even more thorough.
View OriginalReply0
GigaBrainAnon
· 01-03 04:54
Ha, you're right. The memory in our brains is really just a broken workbench, and we're limited by heaven to only 4 to 6 chunks, so there's no way to add more memory. But AI is different; its forgetting is purely a design choice. Next time we chat, it will be completely deleted, and our forgetting is truly a decay competition—way too far apart.
View OriginalReply0
ZenMiner
· 01-03 04:49
So AI isn't really forgetting at all; it's just pretending not to remember. That's a bit sneaky.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 01-03 04:35
nah this misses the plot tho... human forgetting isn't just capacity limits, there's actual competing incentives baked into the system. ai just hits a hard wall & resets. totally different beast. blockchain doesn't forget either, which is the funny part nobody talks about
Reply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 01-03 04:35
Here comes another analogy, right? I'll just say it directly—human short-term memory is like my liquidation risk points. Once overloaded, it completely crashes and can't be saved. That AI context window? That thing is just a digital version of the liquidation price. When the time comes, it gets forcibly closed, and the market clears very quickly. What's the difference? My huge loss is because neurons are fighting, while AI liquidation is dictated by the architecture. The latter can at least be reopened; the former? Just wait to add more funds.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationTherapist
· 01-03 04:27
I knew it, the limitation of 4 to 6 chunks in the human brain is really incredible; it can't be broken through at all.
AI doesn't forget at all; it simply can't read things outside the window. Next time we chat, just clear it directly. Meanwhile, we're repeatedly tormented by old memories.
Human memory and AI memory mechanisms both seem to "forget," but the underlying logical differences are enormous.
During a day’s activities, the information being processed in the human brain is like an AI’s short-term context window—accessible at the moment, capable of reasoning, and finding associations, but inherently limited in capacity. The further back the information, the easier it is to accumulate, and attention begins to scatter.
Human short-term memory is more like a workbench, with a limited number of information chunks that can be stably handled—cognitive psychology typically estimates this to fluctuate between 4 and 6 "chunks." This limit is fixed; you cannot break through it. While AI’s context window also has an upper limit, the design logic behind this limit is entirely different—it’s not constrained by biological neural networks but by computational architecture.
Humans forget because the connections between neurons decay, compete, and are overwritten by new memories. AI "forgets" essentially because once the processing window is exceeded, it cannot read the previous information—next session starts anew, and the previous data truly disappears. The mechanisms of these two types of forgetting are fundamentally different.