2026-01-03 04:22:15

BEAT's recent surge to 4.5 reaching a new high, the underlying logic is very clear—main players are creating liquidity at high levels to attract retail investors to buy in. Last night's small rebound was a temptation signal; many thought it was a bottom confirmation, but in reality, it was a reverse operation entry point.

1.1 Positioning short positions at this level was very precise; during the continuous decline, target levels were almost all hit, and the final 3000U was smoothly pocketed. Once the market structure is understood, trading becomes a game of probabilities—not about betting on rise or fall, but about recognizing the main players' intentions.

Now, opportunities are everywhere in the market; the issue is not how many opportunities there are, but whether anyone truly understands these structures. The next round of positioning is already in preparation, just progressing according to the established rhythm. Trading itself is simple; what’s complex is human psychology. Those who attempt to get rich overnight are often the ones who lose the fastest.

BEAT-14,98%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ImpermanentLossFan

· 01-03 06:22

Uh, I've heard this set of arguments many times before, main force intentions, probability games... in the end, it's just armchair strategizing. By the way, did you really get that 3000U? You're just painting a pie for retail investors again.

View OriginalReply0

orphaned_block

· 01-03 04:52

It's the same old story again. If the main players' intentions were so easy to identify, retail investors wouldn't be losing money.

View OriginalReply0

0xSunnyDay

· 01-03 04:52

It's the same old story, the retail investors like us are always the ones catching the bag at high prices. Are your short positions precise? Why not share some more practical tips. The main force's intentions are easy to say, but you'll only realize when you start losing money on the opposite side. I didn't understand this wave of market movement, but judging by your analysis, it feels like you're about to get trapped again. Human nature is complicated? It's just greed acting up. Sounds profound, but in reality, you still have to figure it out on your own. I've already bought in at 4.5, and now I'm panicking.

View OriginalReply0

YieldChaser

· 01-03 04:51

Another expert shares their experience: does earning 3000U feel this good?

View OriginalReply0

PumpBeforeRug

· 01-03 04:49

It's the same old story, I've seen through it long ago. The retail investors getting caught holding the bag play out every year, does no one learn from experience? Bragging about cashing out at 3000U, don't cry next time you're trapped. What are the main players' intentions? Haha, how do you know what they're thinking? Sounds nice, but it's just a gamble that paid off once. Talking about structure and probability every day, but isn't that just gambler's psychology?

View OriginalReply0

0xInsomnia

· 01-03 04:45

He's started talking about the main force's intentions again, I've heard it so many times. --- Short position hitting 3000U is indeed comfortable, but it always feels a bit虚 when I say it out loud. --- I understand the underlying logic, but when it comes to actual操作, it's still easy to be driven by emotions. --- I've heard the phrase "Understanding the structure is a game of probability" too many times. --- People's hearts are the biggest enemy, there's nothing wrong with that statement. --- I really didn't react to that 4.5 wave, got caught again. --- Every time I say the next round of布局 is ready, how come I've never seen a翻车? --- Identifying the main force's intentions is simple, but in actual操作, it's all about猜. --- Securing 3000U and taking profits is indeed good, I'm still waiting for a rebound. --- The more you think about getting rich overnight, the faster you lose money; this rule is quite accurate.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeLover

· 01-03 04:33

It's the same old rhetoric again, main force intentions, structural recognition... I'm getting tired of hearing it all. This wave was indeed precise, but what about next time? The probability game sounds nice in theory. Cashing out 3000U is good, but I always feel there's a strong post-hoc rationalization vibe. The biggest opponent is human nature, and that hits pretty close to home. It's easy to look at but hard to do; those who truly make money wouldn't be here rambling. Your logical reasoning sounds to me like you're just trying to boost your confidence.

View OriginalReply0

MEVvictim

· 01-03 04:32

Another story about cutting leeks, I'm already tired of hearing it --- Cash out 3000U and then boast? If the market was so easy to predict, why are you still posting here --- It's quite clear, but I just want to ask, is this really that easy to calculate --- Main force's intention? I think it's just gambler psychology --- Those who understand the structure are counting money, they wouldn't be here teaching others --- Reverse operation, reverse operation, and in the end, isn't it just the worst loss --- There's some truth to it, but whether you believe it or not, I choose to hold coins and observe --- Always saying they understand the market, have you really made money?

View OriginalReply0