Speaking of walking on thin ice, retail investors simply don't deserve this term. The ones truly trembling are the big players—one wrong step, and they can't turn things around for generations. But the key issue is information asymmetry, which is the biggest moat for the big players.
They know exactly how many coins and positions they hold across thousands of wallets, and can estimate the retail investors' holdings. Conversely, retail investors have no idea about the big players' bottom line. Hundreds or thousands of addresses are mixed and scattered; they don't know when to clear their positions or when the account is settled. This information gap gives the big players an absolute advantage.
Technical indicators are the most sensitive issue. Don't treat Bollinger Bands, KDJ, MACD as treasures. Back in 1999, traders behind exchanges were already very familiar with these tools, and their accuracy was quite high at the time. Now they are everywhere, and their effectiveness has been greatly weakened. Once retail investors learn how to use technical analysis, it becomes ineffective. But not learning is not an option—you need to be able to observe volume changes and judge the rhythm of the big players' dump and bottom-fishing, or you'll ride the roller coaster in a bull market and end up losing your principal.
Interestingly, if retail investors can truly form a united front, they can also turn around and cut off some big players with low control volume. The advantage of retail investors is that small ships can turn quickly, with flexible funds, and can escape at any time. Big players can't do this. For coins with smaller holdings, if retail investors collectively decide they've made enough and start selling, the small big players don't have enough funds to absorb the sell-off, nor can they offload enough chips, and they end up being counterattacked by retail investors. But such situations are rare; retail investors, to put it plainly, don't have a unified mind.
The situation with altcoins is even more complicated. Big players on top-tier exchanges are usually colluding with the exchange itself to manipulate the market. Only those coins with exceptional value and popularity—mainstream coins—are exceptions, where the exchange actively seeks to list them.
You’ve also seen the recent trend. On October 11, many coins dropped with no volume, clearly manipulating the K-line, and everyone is aware of it.
The big players' funds are generally divided into three parts: one for bottom-fishing and accumulating, one for pumping to create hype, and one reserved for extreme situations. Before the market warms up, most altcoin big players dare not pump and can only follow the market. Of course, some bold and well-funded big players might take a contrarian approach to make a quick profit, but this tactic only works for coins that have already accumulated 99% of the circulating chips, like ZEC.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketSunriser
· 01-06 00:37
Retail investors banding together? Ha, let's first get them to unify their thoughts, which is basically impossible.
That's quite right; information asymmetry is the lifeblood of the big players. We're always groping in the dark.
Technical indicators are already everywhere, but ignoring them isn't an option either—that's just ridiculous.
I saw clearly the wave of unvolume decline in October; it was obvious they were just cutting the leeks.
Small coin projects counterattacking small whales is just talk; in reality, it's almost nonexistent.
Exchanges and big players colluding to manipulate the market means retail investors have no chance at all.
A small boat can turn around quickly—that's the only advantage retail investors have, but only if you can spot the change in trend in time.
Why are some still using MACD as gospel? It's long overdue to wake up.
For big players with 99% of the floating chips, they can do whatever they want.
Basically, it's just waiting for the big players to slip up. But who knows how long that will take?
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperer
· 01-04 08:39
Retail investors banding together? Wake up, it's impossible to be on the same page in this lifetime. The information gap is a deadlock.
The market maker plays a data game, while we are playing a gambling game.
The unlimited K-line trick is really brilliant, clearly bullying retail investors.
Technical indicators are already everywhere, but we still have to learn them. It's really fucking ironic.
ZEC, with 99% of its chips in hand, dares to manipulate the market casually. What we encounter are those who haven't had enough yet.
If small coin retail investors could truly unite to fight back against the market maker, but the reality is each acting independently, and in the end, they are still harvested.
The information gap is a moat that cannot be crossed, just accept it.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 01-03 22:13
In theory, retail investors banding together can counterattack, but in reality, everyone acts independently and gets cut. This contract design is brilliant.
The information gap is basically the smart trap set by the market makers. We're all experimenting within it.
Technical indicators have long since become ineffective. Learning this stuff now is like reading ancient texts—maximum academic value, minimum practical value.
The move of changing K-line with volume is ruthless. It's obvious construction, yet some still can't see through it.
Only coins like ZEC, where 99% of the chips are already in hand, dare to play. Other market makers simply don't have that courage, locking themselves inside.
If retail investors could truly unify their thoughts, I would have become a saint. Now, I’ve mastered how to get cut.
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapist
· 01-03 03:54
Information asymmetry is essentially the lifeline of the market makers; retail investors are always kept in the dark.
Market makers can't match the flexibility of retail investors, that's for sure, but banding together? Ha, retail investors have already messed themselves up.
Using unlimited decline to change K-line patterns is an old trick, but it works.
The most ruthless strategy is coordinated manipulation among clone projects; once exchanges get involved, retail investors are out of the game.
Learning all the technical indicators is pointless; market makers have already played them out.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenYield
· 01-03 03:53
no cap, the info asymmetry angle hits different. been watching these wallet clusters for years and it's literally just... dark pools with extra steps. retail thinks they're playing 4d chess when they're stuck on checkers ngl
Reply0
CompoundPersonality
· 01-03 03:41
It's hard for retail investors to band together, and that's true... but the real problem is that no one is truly willing to unite; everyone plays their own game.
Information asymmetry is like a sword hanging over your head; you can't dodge it.
The ZEC example is perfect; it means that the game played by the big players is completely out of reach for retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 01-03 03:37
Exactly right, retail investors are just being exploited by this information gap. The big players are using a strategy of "dimensionality reduction attack."
Retail investors can't unite; frankly, it's human nature. Only when interests align can we work together, each playing their own game.
Technical indicators are already everywhere; now they look like weather forecasts—what's the use? In the end, it still depends on the mood of the big players.
Speaking of walking on thin ice, retail investors simply don't deserve this term. The ones truly trembling are the big players—one wrong step, and they can't turn things around for generations. But the key issue is information asymmetry, which is the biggest moat for the big players.
They know exactly how many coins and positions they hold across thousands of wallets, and can estimate the retail investors' holdings. Conversely, retail investors have no idea about the big players' bottom line. Hundreds or thousands of addresses are mixed and scattered; they don't know when to clear their positions or when the account is settled. This information gap gives the big players an absolute advantage.
Technical indicators are the most sensitive issue. Don't treat Bollinger Bands, KDJ, MACD as treasures. Back in 1999, traders behind exchanges were already very familiar with these tools, and their accuracy was quite high at the time. Now they are everywhere, and their effectiveness has been greatly weakened. Once retail investors learn how to use technical analysis, it becomes ineffective. But not learning is not an option—you need to be able to observe volume changes and judge the rhythm of the big players' dump and bottom-fishing, or you'll ride the roller coaster in a bull market and end up losing your principal.
Interestingly, if retail investors can truly form a united front, they can also turn around and cut off some big players with low control volume. The advantage of retail investors is that small ships can turn quickly, with flexible funds, and can escape at any time. Big players can't do this. For coins with smaller holdings, if retail investors collectively decide they've made enough and start selling, the small big players don't have enough funds to absorb the sell-off, nor can they offload enough chips, and they end up being counterattacked by retail investors. But such situations are rare; retail investors, to put it plainly, don't have a unified mind.
The situation with altcoins is even more complicated. Big players on top-tier exchanges are usually colluding with the exchange itself to manipulate the market. Only those coins with exceptional value and popularity—mainstream coins—are exceptions, where the exchange actively seeks to list them.
You’ve also seen the recent trend. On October 11, many coins dropped with no volume, clearly manipulating the K-line, and everyone is aware of it.
The big players' funds are generally divided into three parts: one for bottom-fishing and accumulating, one for pumping to create hype, and one reserved for extreme situations. Before the market warms up, most altcoin big players dare not pump and can only follow the market. Of course, some bold and well-funded big players might take a contrarian approach to make a quick profit, but this tactic only works for coins that have already accumulated 99% of the circulating chips, like ZEC.