Regarding WCT and similar internal exchange tokens, you must stay vigilant before participating. The most critical flaw of this project lies in its token design, which has an infinite issuance loophole, meaning liquidity is always at risk of dilution. What’s more concerning is the project team’s operational logic—making numerous promises but rarely delivering actual results. The entire team seems more like they are just hyping and creating momentum.

Market performance data speaks for itself: since launch, the price has fallen by as much as 17 times, and this is no coincidence. Observing historical patterns, these types of projects usually maintain a three- to four-day upward trend during a pump cycle, but ultimately they are inevitably pulled back to their original state. The manipulative tactics behind the scenes are also not sophisticated—merely repeatedly exploiting retail investors’ FOMO to create a false sense of prosperity.

To survive longer in this market, the key is to see through the project’s fundamental logic. The difference between a good project and a bad one is not in short-term price fluctuations but in its underlying mechanism design and team execution capability. For projects with inherent flaws in their mechanisms, no matter how attractive the concept packaging is, it cannot change the final outcome.