Recently, there have been quite a few developments in the precious metals market. Gold plummeted over $246 overnight, and domestic gold prices also dropped nearly 1800 yuan per ounce in response. Such a single-day decline is indeed rare in recent years. Meanwhile, there are rumors that a major American bank is facing a $2.3 billion margin shortfall due to large short positions on silver, with the risk of forced liquidation looming overhead.
This situation points to several underlying issues. First, the technical correction after several months of continuous rise in precious metals. Second, liquidity pressure caused by large short positions on the banking side. Third, the Federal Reserve has had to inject over $50 billion in liquidity twice in a row to stabilize the situation. In short, the market’s sense of "tension" has already emerged.
Even more worth pondering is the price gap between COMEX silver futures and physical silver in Shanghai and Dubai—this spread has hit a multi-decade high. This reflects a phenomenon: investor confidence in paper financial derivatives is waning, and more and more people are turning to physical delivery or cross-market arbitrage to hedge risks. This shift in mindset itself is a signal.
In the short term, it might just be a technical adjustment, but considering the tight liquidity and frequent regulatory interventions, there seems to be a slow accumulation of potential systemic risks. In the tug-of-war between traditional financial markets and physical asset pricing, volatility often precedes the truth. That’s also why recent crypto market performance is worth paying attention to—when cracks appear in traditional financial order, capital flows seeking alternative assets tend to change noticeably.
What’s your view on this round of adjustment? Is the Federal Reserve’s frequent interventions a risk prevention measure, or have the risks already been there all along?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropJunkie
· 21h ago
The confidence in paper silver has collapsed. This is the real opportunity in crypto. Let's wait and see where the funds flow to.
View OriginalReply0
ProveMyZK
· 21h ago
The Federal Reserve's frequent interventions are nothing more than plugging holes, but the holes have already been there, okay? This wave of gold plunging is just the tip of the iceberg. The collapse of fiat currency trust and the premium on physical assets—these signals are too obvious...
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapist
· 21h ago
The moment paper gold gaps to a new high, I knew it was a big deal. This is the market voting.
Recently, there have been quite a few developments in the precious metals market. Gold plummeted over $246 overnight, and domestic gold prices also dropped nearly 1800 yuan per ounce in response. Such a single-day decline is indeed rare in recent years. Meanwhile, there are rumors that a major American bank is facing a $2.3 billion margin shortfall due to large short positions on silver, with the risk of forced liquidation looming overhead.
This situation points to several underlying issues. First, the technical correction after several months of continuous rise in precious metals. Second, liquidity pressure caused by large short positions on the banking side. Third, the Federal Reserve has had to inject over $50 billion in liquidity twice in a row to stabilize the situation. In short, the market’s sense of "tension" has already emerged.
Even more worth pondering is the price gap between COMEX silver futures and physical silver in Shanghai and Dubai—this spread has hit a multi-decade high. This reflects a phenomenon: investor confidence in paper financial derivatives is waning, and more and more people are turning to physical delivery or cross-market arbitrage to hedge risks. This shift in mindset itself is a signal.
In the short term, it might just be a technical adjustment, but considering the tight liquidity and frequent regulatory interventions, there seems to be a slow accumulation of potential systemic risks. In the tug-of-war between traditional financial markets and physical asset pricing, volatility often precedes the truth. That’s also why recent crypto market performance is worth paying attention to—when cracks appear in traditional financial order, capital flows seeking alternative assets tend to change noticeably.
What’s your view on this round of adjustment? Is the Federal Reserve’s frequent interventions a risk prevention measure, or have the risks already been there all along?