Recently, many people in the crypto circle have been discussing a hotly debated coin. I also pondered for a while and wanted to analyze it from several angles.



**How genuine is it really?**
To be honest, since this has been going on for so long, it's hard to determine what's true or false. But I’ve looked through a lot of information and haven't found any substantial evidence to say it's fake. Instead of obsessing over a 50/50 probability, it’s better to look forward.

**Could it be a rug pull?**
That's a concern many have. But from the data, the distribution of token holdings is very dispersed, and there aren't many related transaction records. Plus, the price has been rising very gradually, not like a sudden pump-and-dump scheme. The only explanation for this trend is that a large number of community members have gradually reached a consensus and accumulated over time. There are no signs of a few whales controlling the market.

**Is the name definitely this one?**
Some ask, even if the prediction is true, why must it be this coin? My view is, just read the original prediction—it's written very plainly, with no cryptic language or hidden messages. Since the expression is so straightforward, there's no need for a secondary interpretation of which coin it refers to.

**What’s next?**
Having gone through a big rise and fall, this coin has shown remarkable resilience. It’s been a long time since I saw a coin maintain such high community enthusiasm after a crash. Looking at the passion of these participants, it’s quite rare even after 2021. Instead of asking about the Spring Festival Gala, predictions, or institutional entry, ask yourself: isn’t it a good thing that such a cohesive community exists?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenDustCollectorvip
· 10h ago
There are many retail holders, and the market is stable. I believe in this logic.
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlackervip
· 17h ago
This logic is a bit far-fetched. Just because the community is popular, it's a good thing? Then pyramid schemes would also be extremely popular.
View OriginalReply0
MainnetDelayedAgainvip
· 17h ago
According to the database, how many days have passed since this article was published, and I am still waiting for an updated data version.
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaservip
· 17h ago
Bitcoin has been fluctuating for so long, but the community's enthusiasm remains the strongest.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 17h ago
I believe in the idea of holding coins in a decentralized manner, but is high community engagement really a good thing? Wake up, buddy.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000vip
· 17h ago
This guy's analysis is okay, but I've heard the argument that a resilient community with high enthusiasm is enough too many times, and in the end, it still gets cut off.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrainvip
· 17h ago
To be honest, a strong community cohesion is great, but this logic somehow feels a bit like "self-suggestion." However, the data is indeed right here.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 17h ago
Really, data doesn't lie. The point about decentralized holdings is indeed solid.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)