In the silver market at 2 a.m., a fierce flash crash caught everyone off guard. In just a few minutes, a 10% drop wiped out hundreds of billions in market value. On the surface, it looked like retail panic selling, but the reality was far more complex—one major bank missed the late-night margin call, resulting in a massive futures position being forcibly liquidated by the system, like knocking over the first domino, triggering a chain reaction of algorithmic sell-offs, and the entire market instantly turned bloodshed.



Behind this incident lies a more terrifying truth than the crash itself: in today’s financial system, a delayed message, an undelivered notification, or even a data error can cause a whale to instantly capsize, dragging the entire market down with it.

The key question is: in a more efficient, transparent, and "code is law" driven crypto world, how can we avoid such "data assassinations"? When your assets and smart contracts rely entirely on external inputs—such as a price feed or a liquidation result—what makes you believe that this data is timely, accurate, and unaltered?

**From Silver Liquidation to On-Chain Settlement: The Twin Brothers of Risk**

This disaster in traditional finance essentially stems from a breakdown in critical risk control data flows. In the crypto world, similar tragedies unfold daily in the form of oracle attacks.

Imagine this scenario: you hold a position in a DeFi lending protocol, and suddenly the oracle feed is delayed. The market is still fine, but on-chain, settlement is based on outdated prices—your position is deemed high risk, and an automatic liquidation is triggered instantly. By the time the price data updates, you’ve already been liquidated.

Even more frightening is that this isn’t just a delay issue. Cases of oracle manipulation by hackers, flash loan attacks, and exploitation by multi-chain arbitrage mechanisms are everywhere. When your financial fate depends on a data source that is either centralized or insufficiently decentralized, risk is already lurking.

**The Contradiction Between Transparency and Reliability**

Crypto finance advocates transparency and decentralization, but the oracle—this "intermediary"—remains a bottleneck. It must be efficient, accurate, and censorship-resistant, yet these requirements often conflict. High-frequency updates can introduce more noise, while excessive decentralization makes consistency difficult to guarantee, and any single data source can become a target.

This is why oracle security has become one of the most critical infrastructure issues in the DeFi ecosystem. Without reliable data inputs, the entire on-chain financial system is like a castle on the sand—blow away a gust of wind, and it collapses. Currently, various protocols are seeking more robust solutions, trying to strike a balance between efficiency and security. But the road ahead is still long.
DEFI-0,8%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CommunitySlackervip
· 4h ago
Oracles are just ticking time bombs; no one can rely on them to survive. Manipulating data is too easy; who can trust it? Another DeFi liquidation story, it's become a routine operation. If banks can make such basic mistakes, who can blame on-chain players? Really, it's better to earn less than to risk using unreliable data sources.
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollectorvip
· 22h ago
The oracle problem hits hard. Basically, it means entrusting fate to a third party. If you're willing to put assets in DeFi, you really should think about this. Speaking of banks, they can even miss margin call notifications. How reliable can on-chain data sources be? The liquidation mechanism is like a ticking time bomb—who knows when it will explode? Instead of debating decentralization, it's better to fix the data as the key point. That's why I only dare to play with small positions. The cases of oracle attacks are really scary enough. Want transparency and security? Unfortunately, you can't have both. It's awkward.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntressvip
· 22h ago
Oracles are really the Achilles' heel of DeFi, no debate. Basically, it's still the centralized fault we have to bear. This recent silver plunge is a vivid lesson. A two-second delay in data feed and you're done, it's hilarious. It seems like using traditional finance methods to replicate crypto risks, the core hasn't changed. I just want to know if any project has truly solved this problem. It feels like all DeFi protocols are betting that oracles won't have issues. A delayed message causing the market to follow and get wrecked is really something to watch out for. The moment a liquidation is triggered is probably scarier than jumping off a building. So decentralized isn't that great after all; flash loans can wipe everything out. I think oracle risk is seriously underestimated. If on-chain finance really blows up someday, oracles will definitely be the first to take the blame.
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlItvip
· 23h ago
Oracles are really the Achilles' heel of DeFi Exactly right, a single delayed message can cause total loss, there's no difference from TradFi It's not the first time being attacked and wiped out by oracles, every time is a painful lesson So now I only test the waters with small amounts, I really don't dare to hold large positions in DeFi lending This is what Web3 hasn't revolutionized, the risks still can't be diversified away
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealervip
· 23h ago
Oracles are just a ticking time bomb; they'll explode sooner or later. The transparency of DeFi is just superficial; if the data source fails, everything is doomed. Isn't this just centralized systems with a different disguise? Laugh out loud. Bank failures can also happen on our chain; fundamentally, there's no difference. Flash loans + oracle delays—this combo can instantly wipe out everything. Instead of trusting oracles, it's wiser to trust yourself and avoid leverage—that's real wisdom. "Code is law," but laws can also be hacked; just thinking about it is terrifying. Every time we talk about decentralization, but if one data source stalls, the whole system fails. The analogy of a sandcastle is perfect; DeFi is currently in this state. When liquidation finally happens, you'll realize you have no control over your assets.
View OriginalReply0
DegenGamblervip
· 23h ago
It's the oracle's fault again; we should have kept a close eye on this thing long ago. --- Banks also fail; do you still want to stay alive on the chain? Laugh out loud. --- A single delayed message can clear your entire position. This business is damn shady. --- So, I tell you, the whole concept of flash loans is bound to cause trouble sooner or later. --- Oracle security = pseudo-proposition; essentially, it's still the same centralized system. --- Believe it or not, I say that the DeFi path is not feasible. --- Wait, who will guarantee the oracles we are using now? --- Those who dare to use on-chain lending are gamblers; I am one of them, haha. --- Data assassination is truly disgusting; there's no way to defend against it. --- This incident reminds me of that Curve incident; it's pretty much the same kind of scheme.
View OriginalReply0
StableGeniusvip
· 23h ago
nah oracle dependency is literally just trad finance's margin call problem wearing a smart contract mask lol. same catastrophe, different UX.
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)