2025-12-30 12:24:15

Looking at the recent situation, the points need to reach 250 to participate, which is indeed a high threshold. Roughly estimating, about 80% of users are likely being blocked out.

What’s the result? The event has instead become a exclusive arena for big players and professional teams, with ordinary users having little chance. Isn’t this going against the original intention? The purpose of airdrops is to attract newcomers and inject vitality into the market.

With such rules in place, the number of users will only decrease. I want to ask the official team how they are considering this.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PriceOracleFairy

· 5h ago

ngl the 250 threshold is basically a liquidity gatekeeping mechanism disguised as participation rules... classic supply-side inefficiency right there. they just nuked 80% of their potential user base with one regulatory stroke lol

Reply0

DataPickledFish

· 21h ago

The 250 threshold is really incredible; about 80% of users are blocked out. Isn't this just a disguised way of cutting leeks? --- It's another game for big players, ordinary people are just陪跑. What was the original purpose of airdrops anyway? --- This move by the official is really clever, driving newcomers away, no need to wait for the user count to drop linearly. --- I just want to know what the people who set these rules are thinking, to go against the original intention to this extent. --- 250 points? Laughable. What's the difference between this and having no new users entering? --- Exclusive session for big players +1, casual players are directly out. The activity design is clear and thorough.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotDayLaborer

· 21h ago

A 250 threshold is really, ordinary people can't afford to play.

View OriginalReply0

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 21h ago

250 points? Laughs. This isn't an airdrop; it's just giving whales money. --- Large investors have already maxed out, and us retail investors are just here to watch the fun. --- The official logic is brilliant—using high thresholds to "protect" the project, but it ends up killing the ecosystem. --- It's ridiculous. Why do they have to set such high barriers? --- Rather than attracting newcomers, it's more like driving them away. --- 250? I only earn 20 a month. When will I reach that? --- It feels like reverse filtering, discouraging those who genuinely want to play. --- Isn't it exactly like that? In the end, only early whales and bots remain. --- Has this design ever considered long-term user retention? --- They talk about decentralization and involving everyone every day, but once the rules are out, it all feels centralized.

View OriginalReply0

VitaliksTwin

· 21h ago

250 points? Laughable, this is just a disguised way to harvest users. Waiting for user churn warning.

View OriginalReply0

HalfPositionRunner