Have you ever calculated this: a sum of money from the parent generation could support a family for a year, but today it might not even cover a month of daily expenses. This is not just about rising prices; frankly, it’s your money being invisibly evaporated. As long as the printing press keeps running, everyone’s savings are being gradually diluted—this process is frighteningly silent.
History is full of such examples. Zimbabwe’s economic collapse was not a joke of history but a vivid lesson: when currency loses its credibility, printing more banknotes won’t buy you a loaf of bread. And those who control the printing presses? They have long since converted their assets into USD or other hard assets to escape.
This also explains why more and more people have been rushing into the crypto market in recent years. Don’t misunderstand—not everyone is betting on getting rich overnight. For many, holding assets that cannot be arbitrarily issued or frozen is the real need—this is an active and necessary battle to defend wealth.
But a new problem arises. When traditional assets like stocks, bonds, and real estate start entering the on-chain world in the form of tokens (RWA), who guarantees that their prices are real and cannot be manipulated? If the pricing power itself can be distorted, then we are merely shifting wealth from the physical world’s cage to another cage in the digital world—essentially still trapped.
This is the real challenge. And solving this problem is exactly the mission of projects like decentralized oracles. They build a layer of protection using code and economic incentives: a tamper-proof, distributed fact-based pricing layer. It doesn’t involve political stances; it’s simply about using technology to ensure that the price discovery process of on-chain assets is transparent and trustworthy.
Compared to helplessly complaining about the printing press, such technical solutions are obviously more pragmatic.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiChef
· 12h ago
Printing presses stop, and wages follow suit—that's the ultimate move.
---
Zimbabwe's hyperinflation is truly a wake-up call. Speaking of which, it seems we're not doing much better now.
---
RWA sounds quite tempting, but I'm just worried it's another case of putting on a different coat but the same old trick.
---
Are oracles reliable? I always feel like there's someone behind the scenes controlling everything.
---
No wonder everyone is rushing onto the chain; fiat currency is just too虚 (fragile/虚幻).
---
Instead of waiting to be cut, it's better to take control of your assets. I can accept this logic.
---
Code doesn't lie, but the coder might—that's the problem.
---
From houses to coins, isn't it just avoiding the same thing—worthlessness?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fc
· 12h ago
Really, it all started with the Zimbabwe incident, and it’s clear that paper money is just a ticking time bomb.
Speaking of which, can the set of oracles truly solve the problem? It still feels a bit uncertain.
Printing machines never stop, and our money depreciates every day. There's nothing we can do about it.
On-chain asset pricing can also be manipulated; it’s just the same old story with a different cover.
Holding assets that cannot be issued more is the real key; there's no doubt about that.
The RWA concept is popular, but how do we solve the trust issue?
Diversifying assets should have been done long ago; just saving money is really foolish.
Are oracles reliable? Does decentralization really make manipulation impossible?
It seems everyone is fleeing from fiat currency, but no matter where they run, they can't escape the fate of being exploited.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerker
· 12h ago
Wow, Zimbabwe's situation really can't be contained anymore, a real-life lesson...
We all feel the devaluation of money, but the key is that most people are still foolishly saving money.
Oracles sound good, but honestly, on-chain pricing isn't necessarily transparent, what can the code guarantee?
Instead of worrying whether the cage is made of iron or digital, it's better to get on board early.
I'm just worried that the technical solutions will also become the next land to be harvested by the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawer
· 12h ago
Starting from the Zimbabwe incident, I gradually realized that instead of holding onto paper money and waiting to die, it's better to be smart and get in the car early.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBot
· 12h ago
It's getting more and more frustrating the more I think about it. Listening to my parents' stories about money since I was young, now looking at my own account, it all feels like an illusion.
Can tokenizing traditional assets really solve the problem? Honestly, it's just another way to cut the leeks. I really have my doubts about whether or not oracles are reliable.
When the printing press stops, only then does crypto have a chance, but who can guarantee that on-chain prices won't be manipulated?
In recent years, more and more people are finding ways out on the chain. Instead of waiting for currency devaluation, it's better to take proactive action, just be careful not to fall into new traps.
Instead of complaining, take action, but the prerequisite is to understand what you're buying. Don't go all in blindly.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 13h ago
Damn, Zimbabwe's example is really incredible. As soon as the printing presses start, prices skyrocket, and our money just silently evaporates.
Jumping from physical cages to digital cages, this logic is truly despairing.
Oracles are indeed a breaking point, but who can guarantee they won't be exploited themselves?
Can't make money and have to watch out for being cut, this is the real portrayal of Web3, brother.
People in the crypto world, half are fleeing inflation, and half are looking for new pits, just cycling back and forth.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 13h ago
It sounds reasonable, but on the other hand, are on-chain assets really transparent? I remember some oracles also failed before.
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 13h ago
ngl the RWA narrative feels slippery... pattern analysis suggests we're just swapping one set of intermediaries for another. who's actually auditing these oracle operators? always gotta DYOR on the incentive structures before buying into the "trustless" marketing tbh
Have you ever calculated this: a sum of money from the parent generation could support a family for a year, but today it might not even cover a month of daily expenses. This is not just about rising prices; frankly, it’s your money being invisibly evaporated. As long as the printing press keeps running, everyone’s savings are being gradually diluted—this process is frighteningly silent.
History is full of such examples. Zimbabwe’s economic collapse was not a joke of history but a vivid lesson: when currency loses its credibility, printing more banknotes won’t buy you a loaf of bread. And those who control the printing presses? They have long since converted their assets into USD or other hard assets to escape.
This also explains why more and more people have been rushing into the crypto market in recent years. Don’t misunderstand—not everyone is betting on getting rich overnight. For many, holding assets that cannot be arbitrarily issued or frozen is the real need—this is an active and necessary battle to defend wealth.
But a new problem arises. When traditional assets like stocks, bonds, and real estate start entering the on-chain world in the form of tokens (RWA), who guarantees that their prices are real and cannot be manipulated? If the pricing power itself can be distorted, then we are merely shifting wealth from the physical world’s cage to another cage in the digital world—essentially still trapped.
This is the real challenge. And solving this problem is exactly the mission of projects like decentralized oracles. They build a layer of protection using code and economic incentives: a tamper-proof, distributed fact-based pricing layer. It doesn’t involve political stances; it’s simply about using technology to ensure that the price discovery process of on-chain assets is transparent and trustworthy.
Compared to helplessly complaining about the printing press, such technical solutions are obviously more pragmatic.